BUFX vs. SPXM
BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust, while SPXM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Azoria. Over the past year, BUFX returned 9.47% vs 8.61% for SPXM. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BUFX charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
BUFX vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BUFX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 1Y
- 9.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 8.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFX vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.76% | 4.89% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 9.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFX and SPXM is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFX vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank
BUFX
SPXM
BUFX vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUFX | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.38 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 2.09 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.50 | 9.77 | +9.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUFX vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFX drawdown since its inception was -2.87%, smaller than the maximum SPXM drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFX and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFX | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -5.08% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -5.08% | +2.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.75% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -0.78% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.49% | — | — |
Volatility
BUFX vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that BUFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFX | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | 0.00% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.39% | 3.96% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02% | 7.66% | -3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.97% | 7.63% | -3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.97% | 7.63% | -3.66% |
BUFX vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFX vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPXM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFX and SPXM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUFX has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFX dropped -2.87% vs SPXM's -5.08%.
On 1-year performance, BUFX leads with 9.47% vs 8.61% for SPXM. On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BUFX has performed better with a 9.47% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
SPXM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
BUFX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SPXM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for BUFX and 0.47% for SPXM.
BUFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUFX and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer