PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFX vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFX vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFX achieves a 4.10% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.


BUFX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.35%
YTD
4.10%
6M
4.88%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFX vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BUFX and KNG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFX vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFX

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFX vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BUFX vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFXKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.68

0.49

+2.19

Drawdowns

BUFX vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFX drawdown since its inception was -2.87%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFX and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFXKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-35.12%

+32.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-5.89%

+5.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-4.13%

+3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

Volatility

BUFX vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFXKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

10.19%

-6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.98%

13.59%

-9.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.98%

17.18%

-13.20%

BUFX vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFX vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BUFX
FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFX and KNG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

BUFX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for BUFX and 0.75% for KNG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFX and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer