BUFMX vs. VMGMX
BUFMX (Buffalo Mid Cap Fund) and VMGMX (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BUFMX returned 8.84%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for VMGMX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BUFMX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VMGMX.
Performance
BUFMX vs. VMGMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFMX achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than VMGMX's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFMX has underperformed VMGMX with an annualized return of 8.84%, while VMGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.
BUFMX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- -2.04%
- 1Y
- -5.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- -0.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
VMGMX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 12.36%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
BUFMX vs. VMGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFMX Buffalo Mid Cap Fund | -0.96% | -1.68% | 6.73% | 26.92% | -27.89% | 14.39% | 34.24% | 37.96% | -7.29% | 13.59% |
VMGMX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares | 10.13% | 10.69% | 15.65% | 23.93% | -28.84% | 20.48% | 34.45% | 33.85% | -5.61% | 21.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFMX and VMGMX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2011 | 0.95 |
The correlation between BUFMX and VMGMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFMX vs. VMGMX — Risk / Return Rank
BUFMX
VMGMX
BUFMX vs. VMGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUFMX | VMGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.14 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | 0.84 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 2.50 | -3.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUFMX vs. VMGMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFMX drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, which is greater than VMGMX's maximum drawdown of -37.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFMX and VMGMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFMX | VMGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.44% | -37.17% | -21.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.37% | -15.95% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.29% | -21.65% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.58% | -37.17% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.58% | -37.17% | +1.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.19% | 0.00% | -9.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -7.00% | -2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.75% | 5.34% | +3.41% |
Volatility
BUFMX vs. VMGMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) is 6.01%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that BUFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFMX | VMGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 6.71% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.69% | 13.64% | -0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.70% | 16.93% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 21.57% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 21.07% | -1.30% |
BUFMX vs. VMGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFMX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than VMGMX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFMX vs. VMGMX - Dividend Comparison
BUFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.41%, more than VMGMX's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFMX Buffalo Mid Cap Fund | 10.41% | 10.31% | 6.93% | 5.21% | 5.46% | 11.45% | 6.91% | 8.20% | 4.47% | 25.22% | 8.49% | 13.06% |
VMGMX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFMX and VMGMX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VMGMX has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to BUFMX (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFMX dropped -58.44% vs VMGMX's -37.17%.
VMGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUFMX and VMGMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer