BUFMX vs. BUFBX
BUFMX (Buffalo Mid Cap Fund) and BUFBX (Buffalo Flexible Income Fund) are both mutual funds - BUFMX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Buffalo, while BUFBX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Buffalo. Over the past 10 years, BUFMX returned 8.04%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for BUFBX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUFMX charges 1.02%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for BUFBX.
Performance
BUFMX vs. BUFBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFMX achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly lower than BUFBX's 11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFMX has underperformed BUFBX with an annualized return of 8.04%, while BUFBX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.47% annualized return.
BUFMX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- -1.99%
- 1Y
- -7.39%
- 3Y*
- 3.24%
- 5Y*
- -0.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
BUFBX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
BUFMX vs. BUFBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFMX Buffalo Mid Cap Fund | -1.99% | -1.68% | 6.73% | 26.92% | -27.89% | 14.39% | 34.24% | 37.96% | -7.29% | 13.59% |
BUFBX Buffalo Flexible Income Fund | 11.15% | 10.37% | 10.26% | 7.42% | 3.97% | 29.97% | -2.27% | 18.76% | -7.01% | 13.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFMX and BUFBX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2001 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BUFMX and BUFBX has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BUFMX vs. BUFBX — Risk / Return Rank
BUFMX
BUFBX
BUFMX vs. BUFBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BUFMX | BUFBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.27 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 3.32 | -3.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | 10.41 | -11.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BUFMX vs. BUFBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFMX drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, which is greater than BUFBX's maximum drawdown of -39.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFMX and BUFBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFMX | BUFBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.44% | -39.78% | -18.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.37% | -4.45% | -13.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.29% | -12.85% | -7.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.58% | -14.67% | -20.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.58% | -35.51% | -0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.14% | -1.70% | -8.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -4.72% | -4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.01% | 1.42% | +7.59% |
Volatility
BUFMX vs. BUFBX - Volatility Comparison
Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) at 3.87%. This indicates that BUFMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BUFMX | BUFBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 3.87% | +3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 7.43% | +6.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.47% | 9.51% | +6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 13.43% | +6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 15.58% | +4.15% |
BUFMX vs. BUFBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFMX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFBX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
BUFMX vs. BUFBX - Dividend Comparison
BUFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, more than BUFBX's 8.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFBX Buffalo Flexible Income Fund | 8.19% | 9.10% | 3.77% | 3.48% | 4.16% | 5.57% | 3.33% | 2.73% | 6.01% | 5.49% | 2.39% | 3.67% |
BUFMX Buffalo Mid Cap Fund | 10.52% | 10.31% | 6.93% | 5.21% | 5.46% | 11.45% | 6.91% | 8.20% | 4.47% | 25.22% | 8.49% | 13.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BUFMX and BUFBX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BUFMX has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to BUFBX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFMX dropped -58.44% vs BUFBX's -39.78%.
BUFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BUFMX and BUFBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer