PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFMX vs. VMVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFMX vs. VMVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFMX achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly lower than VMVAX's 11.06% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFMX has underperformed VMVAX with an annualized return of 8.46%, while VMVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.59% annualized return.


BUFMX

1D
1.85%
1M
4.14%
YTD
-1.51%
6M
-2.85%
1Y
-5.03%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
0.00%
10Y*
8.46%

VMVAX

1D
0.05%
1M
0.74%
YTD
11.06%
6M
10.03%
1Y
23.32%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
10.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFMX vs. VMVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BUFMX
Buffalo Mid Cap Fund
-1.51%-1.68%6.73%26.92%-27.89%14.39%34.24%37.96%-7.29%13.59%
VMVAX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares
11.06%12.06%13.63%10.12%-7.89%28.77%2.45%28.03%-12.44%17.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFMX and VMVAX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2011

0.82

The correlation between BUFMX and VMVAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFMX vs. VMVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFMX
BUFMX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BUFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

VMVAX
VMVAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VMVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VMVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFMX vs. VMVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BUFMXVMVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.36

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

3.42

-3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

13.02

-13.59

BUFMX vs. VMVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the VMVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFMX and VMVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BUFMX vs. VMVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFMX drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, which is greater than VMVAX's maximum drawdown of -43.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFMX and VMVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFMXVMVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.44%

-43.07%

-15.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.37%

-6.95%

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.29%

-18.40%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.58%

-19.75%

-15.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.58%

-43.07%

+7.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.70%

-1.68%

-8.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-4.36%

-5.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.73%

1.82%

+6.91%

Volatility

BUFMX vs. VMVAX - Volatility Comparison

Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMVAX) at 3.43%. This indicates that BUFMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFMXVMVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

3.43%

+2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.70%

8.38%

+4.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.66%

11.61%

+4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.23%

16.01%

+4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

18.80%

+0.97%

BUFMX vs. VMVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFMX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVAX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFMX vs. VMVAX - Dividend Comparison

BUFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.47%, more than VMVAX's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFMX
Buffalo Mid Cap Fund
10.47%10.31%6.93%5.21%5.46%11.45%6.91%8.20%4.47%25.22%8.49%13.06%
VMVAX
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.87%2.10%2.11%2.26%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.08%2.75%1.86%1.91%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


BUFMX and VMVAX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFMX has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to VMVAX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFMX dropped -58.44% vs VMVAX's -43.07%.

VMVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFMX and VMVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer