VMGMX vs. VOT
VMGMX (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds from Vanguard. Over the past 10 years, VMGMX returned 12.16%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for VOT. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.07% expense ratio.
Performance
VMGMX vs. VOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VMGMX achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly lower than VOT's 9.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VMGMX having a 12.16% annualized return and VOT not far ahead at 12.27%.
VMGMX
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 12.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
VOT
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 13.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
VMGMX vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMGMX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares | 8.22% | 10.69% | 15.65% | 23.93% | -28.84% | 20.48% | 34.45% | 33.85% | -5.61% | 21.83% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 9.30% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 33.76% | -5.56% | 21.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMGMX and VOT is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2011 | 1.00 |
The correlation between VMGMX and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
VMGMX vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VMGMX
VOT
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
VMGMX
VOT
Industrials
VMGMX
VOT
Consumer Cyclical
VMGMX
VOT
Healthcare
VMGMX
VOT
Financial Services
VMGMX
VOT
Real Estate
VMGMX
VOT
Communication Services
VMGMX
VOT
Utilities
VMGMX
VOT
Energy
VMGMX
VOT
Basic Materials
VMGMX
VOT
Consumer Defensive
VMGMX
VOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VMGMX vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank
VMGMX
VOT
VMGMX vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VMGMX | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.15 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 0.89 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.53 | 2.68 | -0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VMGMX | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.34 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.59 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.45 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
VMGMX vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMGMX drawdown since its inception was -37.17%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMGMX and VOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VMGMX | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.17% | -60.16% | +22.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.95% | -15.96% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.65% | -21.77% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.17% | -37.19% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.17% | -37.19% | +0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -9.97% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.31% | 5.32% | -0.01% |
Volatility
VMGMX vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VMGMX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VMGMX | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 4.22% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | 12.35% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 15.80% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 21.36% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 20.99% | 0.00% |
VMGMX vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VMGMX and VOT have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VMGMX vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison
VMGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, which matches VOT's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMGMX Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares | 0.61% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.82% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.61% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, VMGMX and VOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VOT has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to VMGMX (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VMGMX dropped -37.17% vs VOT's -60.16%.
VOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VMGMX and VOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer