BUFMX vs. VMFGX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BUFMX (Buffalo Mid Cap Fund) and VMFGX (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BUFMX returned 7.58%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for VMFGX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BUFMX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VMFGX.

Performance

BUFMX vs. VMFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFMX achieves a -3.71% return, which is significantly lower than VMFGX's 17.38% return. Over the past 10 years, BUFMX has underperformed VMFGX with an annualized return of 7.58%, while VMFGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.01% annualized return.

BUFMX

• 1D: 2.41%
• 1M: -1.75%
• 6M: 1.74%
• YTD: -3.71%
• 1Y: -10.07%
• 3Y*: 2.91%
• 5Y*: -1.13%
• 10Y*: 7.58%
• ALL TIME*: 7.65%

VMFGX

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: -1.51%
• 6M: 11.73%
• YTD: 17.38%
• 1Y: 22.85%
• 3Y*: 14.99%
• 5Y*: 7.90%
• 10Y*: 11.01%
• ALL TIME*: 12.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BUFMX Buffalo Mid Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VMFGX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BUFMX vs. VMFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BUFMX Buffalo Mid Cap Fund	-3.71%	-1.68%	6.73%	26.92%	-27.89%	14.39%	34.24%	37.96%	-7.29%	13.59%
VMFGX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	17.38%	7.43%	15.86%	17.42%	-18.99%	18.83%	22.61%	26.20%	-10.39%	19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFMX and VMFGX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012	0.91

The correlation between BUFMX and VMFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BUFMX vs. VMFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUFMX

BUFMX Risk / Return Rank: 1
BUFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BUFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BUFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BUFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BUFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

VMFGX

VMFGX Risk / Return Rank: 52
VMFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
VMFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
VMFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
VMFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
VMFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUFMX vs. VMFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUFMX	VMFGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	1.40	-1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.66	2.05	-2.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.25	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	2.48	-3.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.03	9.12	-10.15

BUFMX vs. VMFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the VMFGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFMX and VMFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUFMX vs. VMFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFMX drawdown since its inception was -58.44%, which is greater than VMFGX's maximum drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFMX and VMFGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFMX	VMFGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.44%	-39.15%	-19.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.71%	-9.91%	-7.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.29%	-25.45%	+5.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.58%	-29.25%	-6.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.58%	-39.15%	+3.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.71%	-3.44%	-8.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.41%	-5.67%	-3.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.91%	2.69%	+6.22%

Volatility

BUFMX vs. VMFGX - Volatility Comparison

Buffalo Mid Cap Fund (BUFMX) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) at 4.62%. This indicates that BUFMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFMX	VMFGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.15%	4.62%	+1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.11%	13.92%	+0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.02%	17.66%	-0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.43%	20.72%	-0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.80%	21.08%	-1.28%

BUFMX vs. VMFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFMX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFGX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFMX vs. VMFGX - Dividend Comparison

BUFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.71%, more than VMFGX's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BUFMX Buffalo Mid Cap Fund	10.71%	10.31%	6.93%	5.21%	5.46%	11.45%	6.91%	8.20%	4.47%	25.22%	8.49%	13.06%
VMFGX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	0.60%	0.70%	0.84%	1.21%	1.12%	0.53%	0.79%	1.22%	1.18%	0.93%	1.14%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUFMX and VMFGX in my portfolio?

BUFMX and VMFGX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUFMX or VMFGX?

BUFMX has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to VMFGX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUFMX dropped -58.44% vs VMFGX's -39.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VMFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.