PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BUFH vs. NVDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BUFH vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFH achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.


BUFH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.45%
6M
2.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDO

1D
-2.46%
1M
14.15%
YTD
18.85%
6M
29.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFH vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BUFH and NVDO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BUFH vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BUFH vs. NVDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BUFHNVDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.91

1.30

+1.61

Drawdowns

BUFH vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFH drawdown since its inception was -1.53%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFH and NVDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BUFHNVDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-16.25%

+14.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-2.68%

+2.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-4.99%

+4.81%

Volatility

BUFH vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BUFHNVDODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

31.93%

-29.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.37%

31.93%

-29.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.37%

31.93%

-29.56%

BUFH vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

BUFH vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BUFH and NVDO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BUFH and 0.77% for NVDO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BUFH and NVDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer