BTRN vs. EZET

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - BTRN tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Trend Indicator Futures Index while EZET tracks the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BTRN returned -22.57% vs -49.07% for EZET. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BTRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.

Performance

BTRN vs. EZET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTRN achieves a -10.38% return, which is significantly higher than EZET's -36.99% return.

BTRN

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.18%
• 6M: -9.55%
• YTD: -10.38%
• 1Y: -22.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.25%

EZET

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 10.09%
• 6M: -18.59%
• YTD: -36.99%
• 1Y: -49.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	$6.41K	$4.49K	$41.74K
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	$400.33K	$484.91K	$668.91K

BTRN vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	-10.38%	4.89%	23.31%
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-36.99%	-11.23%	-4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BTRN and EZET is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.58

The correlation between BTRN and EZET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTRN vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTRN

BTRN Risk / Return Rank: 1
BTRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BTRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BTRN Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BTRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTRN Martin Ratio Rank: 2

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 3
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTRN vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTRN	EZET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.37	-0.74	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.85	-0.95	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	0.89	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	-0.72	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.31	-1.07	-0.24

BTRN vs. EZET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTRN Sharpe Ratio is -1.37, which is lower than the EZET Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTRN and EZET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTRN vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTRN drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum EZET drawdown of -67.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTRN and EZET.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTRN	EZET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.97%	-67.89%	+30.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.73%	-67.89%	+42.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.19%	-61.38%	+35.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.20%	-35.30%	+20.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.20%	45.69%	-28.49%

Volatility

BTRN vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) is 2.68%, while Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that BTRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTRN	EZET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.68%	11.10%	-8.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.75%	43.45%	-33.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.62%	66.94%	-50.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.91%	71.19%	-41.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.91%	71.19%	-41.28%

BTRN vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTRN vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison

BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.32%, while EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF	31.32%	27.76%	2.56%
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTRN and EZET in my portfolio?

BTRN and EZET have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTRN or EZET?

EZET has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to BTRN (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTRN dropped -36.97% vs EZET's -67.89%.

Which ETF is better, BTRN or EZET?

On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -22.57% vs -49.07% for EZET. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTRN or EZET?

Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -22.57% return vs -49.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTRN or EZET?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTRN or EZET?

BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 31.32%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.

What is the main difference between BTRN and EZET?

BTRN tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Trend Indicator Futures Index, while EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTRN and 0.19% for EZET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.74 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.