BTR vs. UNOV

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

BTR (Beacon Tactical Risk ETF) and UNOV (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November) are both exchange-traded funds - BTR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Beacon, while UNOV is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index. BTR is actively managed, while UNOV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BTR returned 5.01%/yr vs 9.59%/yr for UNOV. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BTR charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UNOV.

Performance

BTR vs. UNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTR achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly higher than UNOV's 6.25% return.

BTR

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 0.95%
• 6M: 7.09%
• YTD: 9.98%
• 1Y: 16.71%
• 3Y*: 5.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UNOV

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.39%
• 6M: 5.27%
• YTD: 6.25%
• 1Y: 11.51%
• 3Y*: 9.59%
• 5Y*: 6.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTR vs. UNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BTR Beacon Tactical Risk ETF	9.98%	-2.15%	14.45%	-6.78%
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November	6.25%	9.92%	9.42%	8.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BTR and UNOV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023	0.65

The correlation between BTR and UNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

BTR vs. UNOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BTR	UNOV
Technology	12.7%	38.4%
Energy	10.4%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	10.0%
Communication Services	9.3%	10.8%
Industrials	9.2%	7.9%
Healthcare	8.8%	8.4%
Utilities	8.4%	2.1%
Basic Materials	8.4%	1.7%
Real Estate	8.2%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	7.8%	4.6%
Financial Services	7.2%	11.0%

Return for Risk

BTR vs. UNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTR

BTR Risk / Return Rank: 65
BTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
BTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
BTR Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
BTR Martin Ratio Rank: 69

UNOV

UNOV Risk / Return Rank: 77
UNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
UNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
UNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
UNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
UNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTR vs. UNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTR	UNOV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.99	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	2.86	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.40	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	2.54	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.07	12.05	-1.99

BTR vs. UNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the UNOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTR and UNOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTR vs. UNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTR drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, which is greater than UNOV's maximum drawdown of -13.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTR and UNOV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTR	UNOV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.67%	-13.84%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.23%	-4.52%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.67%	-9.10%	-7.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	0.00%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-1.64%	-3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	0.95%	+0.67%

Volatility

BTR vs. UNOV - Volatility Comparison

Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) at 1.91%. This indicates that BTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTR	UNOV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	1.91%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.24%	4.97%	+2.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.87%	5.77%	+4.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.86%	6.89%	+3.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.86%	7.70%	+3.16%

BTR vs. UNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than UNOV's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTR vs. UNOV - Dividend Comparison

BTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BTR Beacon Tactical Risk ETF	1.17%	1.29%	0.87%	0.91%
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTR and UNOV in my portfolio?

BTR and UNOV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTR or UNOV?

BTR has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to UNOV (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTR dropped -16.67% vs UNOV's -13.84%.

Which ETF is better, BTR or UNOV?

On 3-year performance, UNOV leads with 9.59% vs 5.01% for BTR. On fees, UNOV is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, UNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTR or UNOV?

Over the 3-year period, UNOV has performed better with a 9.59% return vs 5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTR or UNOV?

UNOV is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for BTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTR or UNOV?

BTR has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.00% for UNOV.

What is the main difference between BTR and UNOV?

BTR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UNOV is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: American Beacon and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for BTR and 0.79% for UNOV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.