PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTR vs. USPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTR vs. USPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTR achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly lower than USPX's 11.39% return.


BTR

1D
0.75%
1M
0.61%
6M
6.41%
YTD
10.46%
1Y
18.33%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.42%

USPX

1D
1.57%
1M
1.59%
6M
9.42%
YTD
11.39%
1Y
22.58%
3Y*
20.76%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
12.33%
ALL TIME*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$90.34K$77.51K$97.29K
$3.21M$2.97M$3.76M

BTR vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BTR
Beacon Tactical Risk ETF
10.46%-2.15%14.45%-6.78%
USPX
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF
11.39%17.78%24.97%16.85%

Correlation

The correlation between BTR and USPX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.73

The correlation between BTR and USPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

BTR vs. USPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BTR
USPX

Technology

12.3%
37.4%

Energy

10.0%
3.4%

Industrials

9.5%
7.9%

Healthcare

9.5%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
8.8%

Utilities

8.7%
2.6%

Communication Services

8.6%
9.6%

Real Estate

8.4%
1.8%

Basic Materials

8.2%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
4.7%

Financial Services

7.5%
12.5%

Technology

BTR
12.3%
USPX
37.4%

Energy

BTR
10.0%
USPX
3.4%

Industrials

BTR
9.5%
USPX
7.9%

Healthcare

BTR
9.5%
USPX
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BTR
9.4%
USPX
8.8%

Utilities

BTR
8.7%
USPX
2.6%

Communication Services

BTR
8.6%
USPX
9.6%

Real Estate

BTR
8.4%
USPX
1.8%

Basic Materials

BTR
8.2%
USPX
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

BTR
7.9%
USPX
4.7%

Financial Services

BTR
7.5%
USPX
12.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTR vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTR
BTR Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTR Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

USPX
USPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
USPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
USPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
USPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
USPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTR vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BTRUSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.31

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.48

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.48

10.39

+1.10

BTR vs. USPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the USPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTR and USPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BTR vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTR drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, smaller than the maximum USPX drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTR and USPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTRUSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-31.21%

+14.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-9.15%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.67%

-19.21%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.08%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-4.40%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

2.18%

-0.58%

Volatility

BTR vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Beacon Tactical Risk ETF (BTR) is 2.25%, while Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that BTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTRUSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

3.73%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.18%

10.32%

-3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

13.01%

-3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.80%

16.32%

-5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.80%

15.98%

-5.18%

BTR vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTR vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison

BTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than USPX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BTR
Beacon Tactical Risk ETF
1.17%1.29%0.87%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USPX
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF
1.08%1.07%1.23%1.35%2.21%2.40%2.51%3.07%2.91%2.60%4.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


BTR and USPX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USPX has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to BTR (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTR dropped -16.67% vs USPX's -31.21%.

On 3-year performance, USPX leads with 20.76% vs 5.09% for BTR. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BTR has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, USPX has performed better with a 20.76% return vs 5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for BTR.

BTR has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 1.08% for USPX.

They also come from different issuers: American Beacon and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for BTR and 0.03% for USPX.

BTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTR and USPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer