BTOT vs. RBIL
BTOT (iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTOT is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. BTOT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
BTOT vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTOT achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.32% return.
BTOT
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTOT vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | 0.62% | 0.12% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.32% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTOT and RBIL is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTOT vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
BTOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RBIL
BTOT vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTOT | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.13 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 42.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTOT vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTOT drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTOT and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTOT | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -0.52% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -0.50% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -0.07% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.10% | — |
Volatility
BTOT vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTOT | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 0.95% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 1.07% | +2.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 1.07% | +2.63% |
BTOT vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTOT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BTOT vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
BTOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | 2.12% | 0.22% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.38% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTOT and RBIL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTOT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTOT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 2.12% for BTOT.
BTOT is categorized as Total Bond Market, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. BTOT tracks Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BTOT and 0.17% for RBIL.
Find the right allocation for BTOT and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer