BTOT vs. BKAG
BTOT (iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF) and BKAG (BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF) are both Total Bond Market funds - BTOT tracks the Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index while BKAG tracks the Bloomberg US Aggregate Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BTOT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for BKAG.
Performance
BTOT vs. BKAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTOT achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than BKAG's 1.03% return.
BTOT
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKAG
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
BTOT vs. BKAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | 1.10% | 0.12% |
BKAG BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF | 1.03% | 0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTOT and BKAG is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTOT vs. BKAG — Risk / Return Rank
BTOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BKAG
BTOT vs. BKAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTOT | BKAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTOT vs. BKAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTOT drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum BKAG drawdown of -18.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTOT and BKAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTOT | BKAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -18.53% | +16.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -1.59% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -7.07% | +6.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.99% | — |
Volatility
BTOT vs. BKAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTOT | BKAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 3.83% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.72% | 6.02% | -2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.72% | 5.54% | -1.82% |
BTOT vs. BKAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTOT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BKAG's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BTOT vs. BKAG - Dividend Comparison
BTOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than BKAG's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKAG BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF | 4.21% | 4.17% | 4.26% | 3.33% | 2.49% | 1.55% | 1.16% |
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | 2.11% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, BTOT and BKAG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BKAG is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKAG is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for BTOT.
BKAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 2.11% for BTOT.
BTOT tracks Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while BKAG tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BTOT and 0.00% for BKAG.
Find the right allocation for BTOT and BKAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer