BTOT vs. SPAB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF (SPAB).
BTOT and SPAB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BTOT is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2025. SPAB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on May 23, 2007. Both BTOT and SPAB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BTOT vs. SPAB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BTOT vs. SPAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.31% |
SPAB SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.13% | 0.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTOT achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than SPAB's 0.13% return.
BTOT
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPAB
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- 0.21%
- 10Y*
- 1.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BTOT vs. SPAB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTOT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPAB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BTOT vs. SPAB — Risk / Return Rank
BTOT
SPAB
BTOT vs. SPAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF (SPAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTOT | SPAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.51 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between BTOT and SPAB is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BTOT vs. SPAB - Dividend Comparison
BTOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than SPAB's 3.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF | 0.93% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPAB SPDR Portfolio Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.98% | 3.97% | 3.86% | 3.34% | 2.59% | 2.11% | 2.43% | 2.92% | 2.96% | 2.67% | 2.63% | 2.59% |
Drawdowns
BTOT vs. SPAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTOT drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum SPAB drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTOT and SPAB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTOT | SPAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -18.56% | +16.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -2.43% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -3.09% | +2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility
BTOT vs. SPAB - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BTOT | SPAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 4.29% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 5.91% | -2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.70% | 5.54% | -1.84% |