PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTOT vs. HTRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTOT vs. HTRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTOT achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly higher than HTRB's 0.35% return.


BTOT

1D
0.13%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.53%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HTRB

1D
0.09%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.35%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTOT vs. HTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BTOT and HTRB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTOT vs. HTRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTOT

HTRB
HTRB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTOT vs. HTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BTOT vs. HTRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTOTHTRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.40

+0.09

Drawdowns

BTOT vs. HTRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTOT drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum HTRB drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTOT and HTRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTOTHTRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-19.48%

+17.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-1.46%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-4.81%

+4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

Volatility

BTOT vs. HTRB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTOTHTRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

3.85%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.69%

6.12%

-2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.69%

5.57%

-1.88%

BTOT vs. HTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTOT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HTRB's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTOT vs. HTRB - Dividend Comparison

BTOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than HTRB's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BTOT
iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF
2.12%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HTRB
Hartford Total Return Bond ETF
4.63%4.66%4.45%3.87%3.08%4.22%4.79%6.30%2.37%0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, BTOT and HTRB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BTOT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTOT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for HTRB.

HTRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 2.12% for BTOT.

BTOT is categorized as Total Bond Market, while HTRB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BTOT and 0.29% for HTRB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTOT and HTRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer