PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTOT vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTOT vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BTOT

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.39%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BPH

1D
1.20%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTOT vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BTOT and BPH is -0.83, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

-0.83

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTOT vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BTOT vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTOTBPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

9.48

-9.07

Drawdowns

BTOT vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTOT drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, roughly equal to the maximum BPH drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTOT and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTOTBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.36%

-2.35%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

0.00%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-1.08%

+0.31%

Volatility

BTOT vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTOTBPHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

25.75%

-22.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.70%

25.75%

-22.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

25.75%

-22.05%

BTOT vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTOT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BTOT vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

BTOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BTOT and BPH have a correlation of -0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BTOT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BTOT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BPH.

BTOT has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.

BTOT is categorized as Total Bond Market, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BTOT and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTOT and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer