BTOT vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTOT (iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BTOT is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.57, they often move in opposite directions. BTOT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

BTOT vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTOT achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.

BTOT

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 6M: 86.00%
• 1Y: 91.89%
• 3Y*: 27.93%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTOT vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF	0.39%	0.31%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	90.47%	-0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BTOT and BNO is -0.57, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	-0.57

Return for Risk

BTOT vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTOT vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF (BTOT) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTOT	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.14	+0.27

Drawdowns

BTOT vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTOT drawdown since its inception was -2.36%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTOT and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTOT	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.36%	-87.06%	+84.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.87%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	-10.29%	+9.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-40.17%	+39.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTOT	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.70%	41.46%	-37.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.70%	35.38%	-31.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.70%	36.68%	-32.98%

BTOT vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTOT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTOT vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

BTOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%
BTOT iShares Total USD Fixed Income Market ETF	2.13%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTOT and BNO in my portfolio?

BTOT and BNO have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BTOT or BNO?

On fees, BTOT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTOT or BNO?

BTOT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTOT or BNO?

BTOT has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between BTOT and BNO?

BTOT is categorized as Total Bond Market, while BNO is Oil & Gas. BTOT tracks Bloomberg US Total Fixed Income Market Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BTOT and 0.90% for BNO.