BTGD vs. EZPZ

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BTGD (STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BTGD is actively managed, while EZPZ is passively managed. Over the past year, BTGD returned -43.38% vs -46.61% for EZPZ. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BTGD charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.

Performance

BTGD vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTGD achieves a -38.50% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -29.45% return.

BTGD

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 1.91%
• 6M: -37.24%
• YTD: -38.50%
• 1Y: -43.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.87%

EZPZ

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 4.08%
• 6M: -18.15%
• YTD: -29.45%
• 1Y: -46.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BTGD STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF	$428.43K	$383.52K	$1.03M
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	$87.09K	$145.30K	$219.56K

BTGD vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTGD STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF	-38.50%	19.28%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-29.45%	-10.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BTGD and EZPZ is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.88

The correlation between BTGD and EZPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTGD vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTGD

BTGD Risk / Return Rank: 3
BTGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BTGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BTGD Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BTGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTGD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTGD vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTGD	EZPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	-0.98	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.92	-1.46	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	0.84	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	-0.83	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.33	-1.25	-0.08

BTGD vs. EZPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is comparable to the EZPZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTGD and EZPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTGD vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTGD drawdown since its inception was -58.79%, roughly equal to the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -56.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTGD and EZPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTGD	EZPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.79%	-56.63%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-58.79%	-56.63%	-2.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.95%	-52.42%	-2.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.27%	-25.29%	+7.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.74%	37.39%	-4.65%

Volatility

BTGD vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison

STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) has a higher volatility of 12.81% compared to Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) at 8.21%. This indicates that BTGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTGD	EZPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.81%	8.21%	+4.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.87%	35.14%	+9.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.20%	47.73%	+10.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.65%	46.83%	+8.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.65%	46.83%	+8.82%

BTGD vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTGD has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTGD vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison

BTGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTGD STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF	5.47%	3.36%	0.19%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTGD and EZPZ in my portfolio?

BTGD and EZPZ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTGD or EZPZ?

BTGD has higher volatility (12.81%) compared to EZPZ (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTGD dropped -58.79% vs EZPZ's -56.63%.

Which ETF is better, BTGD or EZPZ?

On 1-year performance, BTGD leads with -43.38% vs -46.61% for EZPZ. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZPZ has been the lower-risk option at 8.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTGD or EZPZ?

Over the 1-year period, BTGD has performed better with a -43.38% return vs -46.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTGD or EZPZ?

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for BTGD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTGD or EZPZ?

BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.

What is the main difference between BTGD and EZPZ?

They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for BTGD and 0.19% for EZPZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.75 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.