BTF vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BTF (Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTF is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Valkyrie, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTF returned -45.62% vs 282.56% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.75, they often move in opposite directions. BTF charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

BTF vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTF achieves a -35.64% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -23.27% return.

BTF

• 1D: -1.77%
• 1M: 1.98%
• 6M: -38.36%
• YTD: -35.64%
• 1Y: -45.62%
• 3Y*: 8.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: 5.07%
• 1M: 46.38%
• 6M: -9.68%
• YTD: -23.27%
• 1Y: 282.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTF vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTF Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF	-35.64%	-12.44%	44.82%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-23.27%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BTF and MSTZ is -0.82, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.75

The correlation between BTF and MSTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.82 to -0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTF vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTF

BTF Risk / Return Rank: 3
BTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BTF Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 68
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTF vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTF	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.84	1.92	-2.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.16	2.45	-3.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.32	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	3.35	-4.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.19	6.53	-7.72

BTF vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTF Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTF and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTF vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTF drawdown since its inception was -77.50%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTF and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTF	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.50%	-99.38%	+21.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.55%	-84.89%	+23.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.91%	-97.39%	+39.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.06%	-94.53%	+54.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.26%	43.51%	-5.25%

Volatility

BTF vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) is 13.50%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.56%. This indicates that BTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTF	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.50%	56.56%	-43.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.08%	135.11%	-95.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.67%	148.53%	-93.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.33%	171.02%	-112.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.33%	171.02%	-112.69%

BTF vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTF has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTF vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

BTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 226.12%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BTF Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF	226.12%	146.05%	52.96%	15.98%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTF and MSTZ in my portfolio?

BTF and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTF or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.56%) compared to BTF (13.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTF dropped -77.50% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, BTF or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 282.56% vs -45.62% for BTF. On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, BTF has been the lower-risk option at 13.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTF or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 282.56% return vs -45.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTF or MSTZ?

MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for BTF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTF or MSTZ?

BTF has the higher dividend yield at 226.12%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between BTF and MSTZ?

BTF is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for BTF and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.