BTF vs. BETH
BTF (Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF) and BETH (ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTF returned -32.30% vs -37.13% for BETH. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BTF charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BETH.
Performance
BTF vs. BETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTF achieves a -30.57% return, which is significantly lower than BETH's -26.73% return.
BTF
- 1D
- -5.41%
- 1M
- -16.05%
- YTD
- -30.57%
- 6M
- -32.41%
- 1Y
- -32.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BETH
- 1D
- -5.96%
- 1M
- -15.22%
- YTD
- -26.73%
- 6M
- -29.49%
- 1Y
- -37.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTF vs. BETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BTF Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF | -30.57% | -12.44% | 67.60% | 48.37% |
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF | -26.73% | -11.20% | 85.03% | 42.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTF and BETH is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023 | 0.97 |
The correlation between BTF and BETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTF vs. BETH — Risk / Return Rank
BTF
BETH
BTF vs. BETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTF | BETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | -0.80 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | -1.04 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.88 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | -0.71 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | -1.22 | +0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTF | BETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.60 | -0.80 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | 0.44 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
BTF vs. BETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTF drawdown since its inception was -77.50%, which is greater than BETH's maximum drawdown of -52.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTF and BETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTF | BETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.50% | -52.55% | -24.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.75% | -52.55% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.59% | -50.48% | -4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.64% | -17.55% | -22.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.13% | 30.53% | +2.60% |
Volatility
BTF vs. BETH - Volatility Comparison
Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) and ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) have volatilities of 9.46% and 9.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTF | BETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.46% | 9.73% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.97% | 36.85% | +3.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.18% | 46.72% | +7.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.42% | 51.18% | +7.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.42% | 51.18% | +7.24% |
BTF vs. BETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTF has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BETH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTF vs. BETH - Dividend Comparison
BTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 209.94%, more than BETH's 55.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF | 55.77% | 57.68% | 19.71% | 0.36% |
BTF Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF | 209.94% | 146.05% | 52.96% | 15.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, BTF and BETH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BETH has higher volatility (9.73%) compared to BTF (9.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTF dropped -77.50% vs BETH's -52.55%.
On 1-year performance, BTF leads with -32.30% vs -37.13% for BETH. On fees, BETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BTF has been the lower-risk option at 9.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTF has performed better with a -32.30% return vs -37.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for BTF.
BTF has the higher dividend yield at 209.94%, compared with 55.77% for BETH.
They also come from different issuers: Valkyrie and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for BTF and 0.95% for BETH.
BTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTF and BETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer