BTF vs. BETH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BTF (CoinShares Bitcoin and Ether ETF) and BETH (ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTF returned -46.94% vs -46.96% for BETH. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. BTF charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BETH.

Performance

BTF vs. BETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoinShares Bitcoin and Ether ETF (BTF) and ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTF achieves a -33.79% return, which is significantly lower than BETH's -31.24% return.

BTF

• 1D: -2.94%
• 1M: 5.69%
• 6M: -28.47%
• YTD: -33.79%
• 1Y: -46.94%
• 3Y*: 10.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -10.26%

BETH

• 1D: -2.97%
• 1M: 2.90%
• 6M: -27.29%
• YTD: -31.24%
• 1Y: -46.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF	$25.58K	$35.12K	$73.06K
BTF CoinShares Bitcoin and Ether ETF	$75.53K	$69.69K	$94.86K

BTF vs. BETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BTF CoinShares Bitcoin and Ether ETF	-33.79%	-12.44%	67.60%	54.09%
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF	-31.24%	-11.20%	85.03%	39.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BTF and BETH is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.97

The correlation between BTF and BETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTF vs. BETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTF

BTF Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BTF Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BETH

BETH Risk / Return Rank: 2
BETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BETH Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BETH Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTF vs. BETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Bitcoin and Ether ETF (BTF) and ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTF	BETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.91	-1.03	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.33	-1.58	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	0.83	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	-0.86	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	-1.31	+0.09

BTF vs. BETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTF Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is comparable to the BETH Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTF and BETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTF vs. BETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTF drawdown since its inception was -77.50%, which is greater than BETH's maximum drawdown of -57.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTF and BETH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTF	BETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.50%	-57.12%	-20.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.55%	-57.12%	-4.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.69%	-53.54%	-3.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.24%	-19.65%	-20.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.45%	37.38%	+3.07%

Volatility

BTF vs. BETH - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Bitcoin and Ether ETF (BTF) has a higher volatility of 10.92% compared to ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) at 9.61%. This indicates that BTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTF	BETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.92%	9.61%	+1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.90%	35.71%	+3.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.47%	47.67%	+6.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.11%	50.63%	+7.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.11%	50.63%	+7.48%

BTF vs. BETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTF has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BETH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTF vs. BETH - Dividend Comparison

BTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 219.80%, more than BETH's 53.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF	41.98%	57.68%	19.71%	0.36%
BTF CoinShares Bitcoin and Ether ETF	219.80%	146.05%	52.96%	15.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTF and BETH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, BTF and BETH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BTF or BETH?

BTF has higher volatility (10.92%) compared to BETH (9.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTF dropped -77.50% vs BETH's -57.12%.

Which ETF is better, BTF or BETH?

On 1-year performance, BTF leads with -46.94% vs -46.96% for BETH. On fees, BETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTF or BETH?

Over the 1-year period, BTF has performed better with a -46.94% return vs -46.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTF or BETH?

BETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for BTF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTF or BETH?

BTF has the higher dividend yield at 219.80%, compared with 41.98% for BETH.

What is the main difference between BTF and BETH?

They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for BTF and 0.95% for BETH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.91 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.