BTDR vs. PUMP
BTDR (Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares) and PUMP (ProPetro Holding Corp.) are both stocks. BTDR operates in Software - Application (Technology), while PUMP operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 3 years, BTDR returned 16.95%/yr vs 23.57%/yr for PUMP. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BTDR vs. PUMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTDR achieves a 62.80% return, which is significantly higher than PUMP's 56.15% return.
BTDR
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 36.70%
- YTD
- 62.80%
- 6M
- 82.32%
- 1Y
- 34.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PUMP
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- -14.90%
- YTD
- 56.15%
- 6M
- 55.99%
- 1Y
- 130.59%
- 3Y*
- 23.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
BTDR vs. PUMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BTDR Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares | 62.80% | -48.27% | 119.78% | 20.10% |
PUMP ProPetro Holding Corp. | 56.15% | 1.93% | 11.34% | 10.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTDR and PUMP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2023 | 0.12 |
Fundamentals
BTDR:
$4.26B
PUMP:
$1.74B
BTDR:
-$2.23
PUMP:
-$0.22
BTDR:
5.58
PUMP:
1.76
BTDR:
5.83
PUMP:
1.76
BTDR:
$739.06M
PUMP:
$909.74M
BTDR:
$25.18M
PUMP:
$79.21M
BTDR:
$59.65M
PUMP:
$158.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTDR vs. PUMP — Risk / Return Rank
BTDR
PUMP
BTDR vs. PUMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares (BTDR) and ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTDR | PUMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.34 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 4.01 | -3.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | 8.86 | -8.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTDR vs. PUMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTDR drawdown since its inception was -79.52%, smaller than the maximum PUMP drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTDR and PUMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTDR | PUMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.52% | -93.88% | +14.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.89% | -32.74% | -39.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.52% | -59.13% | -20.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -72.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.08% | -39.78% | +9.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.58% | -52.14% | +8.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.94% | 14.80% | +28.14% |
Volatility
BTDR vs. PUMP - Volatility Comparison
Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares (BTDR) has a higher volatility of 29.93% compared to ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) at 18.10%. This indicates that BTDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTDR | PUMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.93% | 18.10% | +11.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.65% | 39.69% | +28.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.77% | 79.15% | +21.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 123.16% | 62.31% | +60.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.16% | 70.95% | +52.21% |
Dividends
BTDR vs. PUMP - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTDR nor PUMP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BTDR vs. PUMP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bitdeer Technologies Group Class A Ordinary Shares and ProPetro Holding Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BTDR and PUMP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTDR has higher volatility (29.93%) compared to PUMP (18.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTDR dropped -79.52% vs PUMP's -93.88%.
PUMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTDR and PUMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer