BTCZ vs. TSLT

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) and TSLT (T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCZ is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by T-Rex, while TSLT is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Tesla, Inc. (200%). BTCZ is actively managed, while TSLT is passively managed. Over the past year, BTCZ returned 77.07% vs -25.29% for TSLT. Their -0.43 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BTCZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLT.

Performance

BTCZ vs. TSLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) and T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCZ achieves a 26.37% return, which is significantly higher than TSLT's -59.36% return.

BTCZ

• 1D: -2.56%
• 1M: -5.17%
• 6M: -5.67%
• YTD: 26.37%
• 1Y: 77.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -52.85%

TSLT

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -44.45%
• 6M: -48.75%
• YTD: -59.36%
• 1Y: -25.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -22.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	$81.92M	$102.22M	$120.66M
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF	$37.13M	$36.47M	$52.40M

BTCZ vs. TSLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	26.37%	-29.11%	-76.45%
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF	-59.36%	-29.49%	74.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCZ and TSLT is -0.43, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024	-0.43

Return for Risk

BTCZ vs. TSLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BTCZ

BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 35
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

TSLT

TSLT Risk / Return Rank: 8
TSLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TSLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
TSLT Omega Ratio Rank: 11
TSLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TSLT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BTCZ vs. TSLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) and T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTCZ	TSLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	-0.27	+1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	0.22	+1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.03	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	-0.36	+1.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.41	-0.77	+4.19

BTCZ vs. TSLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the TSLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCZ and TSLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTCZ vs. TSLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCZ drawdown since its inception was -91.06%, which is greater than TSLT's maximum drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCZ and TSLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCZ	TSLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.06%	-83.16%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.02%	-70.65%	+21.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.62%	-80.26%	+0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.94%	-51.57%	-22.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.68%	32.80%	-10.12%

Volatility

BTCZ vs. TSLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) is 16.44%, while T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) has a volatility of 39.38%. This indicates that BTCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCZ	TSLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.44%	39.38%	-22.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.00%	70.82%	-4.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.92%	92.41%	-3.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.41%	117.56%	-22.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.41%	117.56%	-22.15%

BTCZ vs. TSLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLT's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCZ vs. TSLT - Dividend Comparison

BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while TSLT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.08%
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCZ and TSLT in my portfolio?

BTCZ and TSLT have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTCZ or TSLT?

TSLT has higher volatility (39.38%) compared to BTCZ (16.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCZ dropped -91.06% vs TSLT's -83.16%.

Which ETF is better, BTCZ or TSLT?

On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 77.07% vs -25.29% for TSLT. On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BTCZ has been the lower-risk option at 16.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTCZ or TSLT?

Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 77.07% return vs -25.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCZ or TSLT?

BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCZ or TSLT?

BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for TSLT.

What is the main difference between BTCZ and TSLT?

BTCZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while TSLT is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BTCZ and 1.05% for TSLT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.