BTCO vs. RSP
BTCO (Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCO is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Reference Bitcoin Rate, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BTCO returned -38.71% vs 19.50% for RSP. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.
Performance
BTCO vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCO achieves a -25.40% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 9.70% return.
BTCO
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -18.43%
- YTD
- -25.40%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSP
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
BTCO vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCO Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF | -25.40% | -6.58% | 100.54% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 9.70% | 11.21% | 13.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCO and RSP is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCO vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank
BTCO
RSP
BTCO vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.30 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 2.49 | -3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 9.48 | -10.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | 1.70 | -2.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.57 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
BTCO vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCO drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCO and RSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.33% | -59.92% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.33% | -7.85% | -41.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.03% | -0.38% | -47.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.95% | -6.65% | -9.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.41% | 2.06% | +26.35% |
Volatility
BTCO vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.56%. This indicates that BTCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCO | RSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.46% | 2.56% | +6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.37% | 8.29% | +26.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.56% | 11.56% | +32.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.77% | 16.18% | +33.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.77% | 18.35% | +31.42% |
BTCO vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCO vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
BTCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCO Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCO and RSP have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCO has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCO dropped -49.33% vs RSP's -59.92%.
On 1-year performance, RSP leads with 19.50% vs -38.71% for BTCO. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSP has performed better with a 19.50% return vs -38.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for BTCO.
RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for BTCO.
BTCO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RSP is S&P 500. BTCO tracks Lukka Prime Reference Bitcoin Rate, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for BTCO and 0.20% for RSP.
RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCO and RSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer