BTCI vs. LFGY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while LFGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCI returned -34.52% vs 8.63% for LFGY. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

BTCI vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -24.80% return, which is significantly lower than LFGY's 17.68% return.

BTCI

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: -19.78%
• YTD: -24.80%
• 6M: -28.14%
• 1Y: -34.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LFGY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.32%
• YTD: 17.68%
• 6M: 7.03%
• 1Y: 8.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCI vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-24.80%	-4.64%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	17.68%	-8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCI and LFGY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025	0.73

The correlation between BTCI and LFGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BTCI vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 2
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 2

LFGY

LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 13
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 14
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCI vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCI	LFGY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	0.23	-1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.19	0.57	-1.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.07	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	0.24	-1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.37	0.53	-1.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTCI vs. LFGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCI Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the LFGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCI and LFGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCI	LFGY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	0.23	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.07	0.14	-0.21

Drawdowns

BTCI vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -44.98%, which is greater than LFGY's maximum drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and LFGY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCI	LFGY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.98%	-35.94%	-9.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.98%	-35.94%	-9.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.39%	-10.11%	-34.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.25%	-14.06%	-1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.20%	16.43%	+8.77%

Volatility

BTCI vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) is 8.15%, while YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a volatility of 10.49%. This indicates that BTCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCI	LFGY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.15%	10.49%	-2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.49%	30.08%	+0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.98%	37.07%	+1.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.12%	41.90%	-1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.12%	41.90%	-1.78%

BTCI vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BTCI and LFGY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

BTCI vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison

BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.34%, less than LFGY's 82.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	44.34%	36.46%	6.76%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	82.56%	94.90%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCI and LFGY in my portfolio?

BTCI and LFGY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTCI or LFGY?

LFGY has higher volatility (10.49%) compared to BTCI (8.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -44.98% vs LFGY's -35.94%.

Which ETF is better, BTCI or LFGY?

On 1-year performance, LFGY leads with 8.63% vs -34.52% for BTCI. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, BTCI has been the lower-risk option at 8.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTCI or LFGY?

Over the 1-year period, LFGY has performed better with a 8.63% return vs -34.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCI or LFGY?

BTCI and LFGY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCI or LFGY?

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 82.56%, compared with 44.34% for BTCI.

What is the main difference between BTCI and LFGY?

BTCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while LFGY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Neos and YieldMax.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LFGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.