BTCI vs. IYRI
BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and IYRI (NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while IYRI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Capped Index. BTCI is actively managed, while IYRI is passively managed. Over the past year, BTCI returned -34.52% vs 9.37% for IYRI. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTCI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for IYRI.
Performance
BTCI vs. IYRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -24.80% return, which is significantly lower than IYRI's 5.46% return.
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -19.78%
- YTD
- -24.80%
- 6M
- -28.14%
- 1Y
- -34.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYRI
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 5.46%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI vs. IYRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -24.80% | -7.31% |
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 5.46% | 7.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCI and IYRI is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCI vs. IYRI — Risk / Return Rank
BTCI
IYRI
BTCI vs. IYRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCI | IYRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.17 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 1.25 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 4.50 | -5.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCI | IYRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | 0.91 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.76 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
BTCI vs. IYRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -44.98%, which is greater than IYRI's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and IYRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCI | IYRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.98% | -12.12% | -32.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.98% | -7.53% | -37.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.39% | -0.87% | -43.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.25% | -1.72% | -13.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.20% | 2.09% | +23.11% |
Volatility
BTCI vs. IYRI - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) at 3.32%. This indicates that BTCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCI | IYRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 3.32% | +4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.49% | 7.28% | +23.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.98% | 10.38% | +28.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.12% | 13.09% | +27.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.12% | 13.09% | +27.03% |
BTCI vs. IYRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IYRI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCI vs. IYRI - Dividend Comparison
BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.34%, more than IYRI's 11.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 44.34% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 11.12% | 11.72% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTCI and IYRI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCI has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to IYRI (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -44.98% vs IYRI's -12.12%.
On 1-year performance, IYRI leads with 9.37% vs -34.52% for BTCI. On fees, IYRI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, IYRI has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IYRI has performed better with a 9.37% return vs -34.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYRI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 44.34%, compared with 11.12% for IYRI.
BTCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IYRI is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BTCI and 0.68% for IYRI.
IYRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTCI and IYRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer