BTCI vs. ILS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCI returned -33.02% vs 7.46% for ILS. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. BTCI charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.

Performance

BTCI vs. ILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -23.73% return, which is significantly lower than ILS's 2.17% return.

BTCI

• 1D: 2.44%
• 1M: -14.38%
• YTD: -23.73%
• 6M: -24.54%
• 1Y: -33.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ILS

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 2.17%
• 6M: 2.46%
• 1Y: 7.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCI vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-23.73%	8.52%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	2.17%	3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCI and ILS is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

BTCI vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 3
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 3

ILS

ILS Risk / Return Rank: 95
ILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
ILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
ILS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
ILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ILS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCI vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BTCI	ILS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.84	2.91	-3.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.10	4.78	-5.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.65	-0.77
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	13.55	-14.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	49.81	-51.04

BTCI vs. ILS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCI Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the ILS Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCI and ILS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BTCI vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -47.16%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and ILS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCI	ILS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.16%	-2.46%	-44.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.16%	-0.55%	-46.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.60%	0.00%	-43.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.98%	-0.54%	-15.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.85%	0.15%	+26.70%

Volatility

BTCI vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a higher volatility of 12.42% compared to Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) at 0.83%. This indicates that BTCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCI	ILS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.42%	0.83%	+11.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.24%	1.68%	+29.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.69%	2.58%	+37.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.30%	3.78%	+36.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.30%	3.78%	+36.52%

BTCI vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTCI vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison

BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.88%, more than ILS's 8.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	46.88%	36.46%	6.76%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	8.06%	6.06%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTCI and ILS in my portfolio?

BTCI and ILS have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTCI or ILS?

BTCI has higher volatility (12.42%) compared to ILS (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTCI dropped -47.16% vs ILS's -2.46%.

Which ETF is better, BTCI or ILS?

On 1-year performance, ILS leads with 7.46% vs -33.02% for BTCI. On fees, BTCI is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, ILS has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTCI or ILS?

Over the 1-year period, ILS has performed better with a 7.46% return vs -33.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTCI or ILS?

BTCI is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTCI or ILS?

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 46.88%, compared with 8.06% for ILS.

What is the main difference between BTCI and ILS?

BTCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BTCI and 1.58% for ILS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.