BTCI vs. BCCC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC).

BTCI and BCCC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BTCI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Oct 16, 2024. BCCC is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Jun 3, 2025.

Performance

BTCI vs. BCCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BTCI vs. BCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-20.30%	-12.93%
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	-18.37%	-7.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -20.30% return, which is significantly lower than BCCC's -18.37% return.

BTCI

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: 3.84%
• YTD: -20.30%
• 6M: -36.82%
• 1Y: -13.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCCC

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 4.09%
• YTD: -18.37%
• 6M: -31.34%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCI vs. BCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BCCC's 0.75% expense ratio.

BTCI

NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF

BCCC

Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF

Return for Risk

BTCI vs. BCCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 7
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCI vs. BCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCI	BCCC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.33	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCI	BCCC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	-0.79	+0.80

Correlation

The correlation between BTCI and BCCC is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BTCI vs. BCCC - Dividend Comparison

BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.61%, less than BCCC's 51.39% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	43.61%	36.46%	6.76%
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	51.39%	29.55%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BTCI vs. BCCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -44.98%, which is greater than BCCC's maximum drawdown of -41.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and BCCC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCI	BCCC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.98%	-41.62%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.07%	-34.76%	-6.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.77%	-14.24%	+1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BTCI	BCCC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.07%	36.66%	+3.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.41%	36.66%	+4.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.41%	36.66%	+4.75%