BTCI vs. BCCC
BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) and BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BTCI returned -34.52% vs -28.98% for BCCC. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BTCI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BCCC.
Performance
BTCI vs. BCCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTCI achieves a -24.80% return, which is significantly lower than BCCC's -23.52% return.
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- -19.78%
- YTD
- -24.80%
- 6M
- -28.14%
- 1Y
- -34.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCCC
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- -18.36%
- YTD
- -23.52%
- 6M
- -24.11%
- 1Y
- -28.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI vs. BCCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -24.80% | -12.93% |
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -23.52% | -7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTCI and BCCC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTCI vs. BCCC — Risk / Return Rank
BTCI
BCCC
BTCI vs. BCCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) and Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BTCI | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTCI | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | -0.83 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
BTCI vs. BCCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTCI drawdown since its inception was -44.98%, which is greater than BCCC's maximum drawdown of -41.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCI and BCCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTCI | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.98% | -41.62% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.98% | -41.62% | -3.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.39% | -38.88% | -5.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.25% | -16.93% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.20% | — | — |
Volatility
BTCI vs. BCCC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTCI | BCCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.98% | 35.09% | +3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.12% | 35.09% | +5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.12% | 35.09% | +5.03% |
BTCI vs. BCCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTCI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BCCC's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTCI vs. BCCC - Dividend Comparison
BTCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.34%, less than BCCC's 64.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 64.17% | 29.55% | 0.00% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 44.34% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, BTCI and BCCC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On 1-year performance, BCCC leads with -28.98% vs -34.52% for BTCI. On fees, BCCC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BCCC has performed better with a -28.98% return vs -34.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BCCC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.
BCCC has the higher dividend yield at 64.17%, compared with 44.34% for BTCI.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BTCI and 0.75% for BCCC.
Find the right allocation for BTCI and BCCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer