PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTCE.DE vs. HODL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BTCE.DE vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BTCE.DE is traded in EUR, while HODL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HODL values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BTCE.DE having a -27.02% return and HODL slightly higher at -26.51%.


BTCE.DE

1D
-3.79%
1M
-21.28%
YTD
-27.02%
6M
-31.67%
1Y
-41.65%
3Y*
28.04%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*

HODL

1D
-2.90%
1M
-21.66%
YTD
-26.51%
6M
-31.12%
1Y
-40.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCE.DE vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BTCE.DE
ETC Group Physical Bitcoin
-27.02%-18.20%108.26%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
-26.51%-17.53%111.70%

Correlation

The correlation between BTCE.DE and HODL is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.74

The correlation between BTCE.DE and HODL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BTCE.DE vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCE.DE
BTCE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BTCE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

HODL
HODL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCE.DE vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTCE.DEHODLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.85

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.82

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

-1.43

-0.03

BTCE.DE vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCE.DE Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is comparable to the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCE.DE and HODL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTCE.DEHODLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.04

-0.94

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.22

+0.36

Drawdowns

BTCE.DE vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCE.DE drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, which is greater than HODL's maximum drawdown of -49.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCE.DE and HODL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BTCE.DEHODLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.62%

-49.53%

-25.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.76%

-49.53%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.27%

-48.93%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.28%

-16.43%

-13.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.52%

28.40%

+0.12%

Volatility

BTCE.DE vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.82% compared to VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) at 9.02%. This indicates that BTCE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BTCE.DEHODLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.82%

9.02%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.25%

33.69%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.81%

43.22%

-3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.58%

49.88%

+2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.85%

49.88%

+7.97%

BTCE.DE vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCE.DE has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BTCE.DE vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BTCE.DE nor HODL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BTCE.DE and HODL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HODL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HODL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 2.00% for BTCE.DE.

They also come from different issuers: ETC Issuance and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 2.00% for BTCE.DE and 0.25% for HODL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BTCE.DE and HODL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer