BTAL vs. CLSE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BTAL (AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) and CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) are both Long-Short funds. BTAL is passively managed, while CLSE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BTAL returned -12.64%/yr vs 32.39%/yr for CLSE. At a correlation of -0.39, they often move in opposite directions. BTAL charges 2.11%/yr vs 1.56%/yr for CLSE.

Performance

BTAL vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTAL achieves a -19.67% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 25.76% return.

BTAL

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -6.55%
• YTD: -19.67%
• 6M: -18.88%
• 1Y: -37.06%
• 3Y*: -12.64%
• 5Y*: -4.56%
• 10Y*: -4.73%

CLSE

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 9.28%
• YTD: 25.76%
• 6M: 28.57%
• 1Y: 50.91%
• 3Y*: 32.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTAL vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund	-19.67%	-20.17%	12.83%	-15.11%	15.36%
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	25.76%	20.44%	35.54%	17.54%	-3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BTAL and CLSE is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2022	-0.39

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BTAL and CLSE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.39 to -0.64, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

BTAL vs. CLSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BTAL	CLSE
Technology	19.5%	33.2%
Financial Services	14.9%	-2.5%
Industrials	13.7%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	6.2%
Healthcare	10.2%	6.5%
Real Estate	6.2%	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	0.9%
Utilities	5.2%	1.7%
Energy	4.4%	2.7%
Basic Materials	4.0%	1.5%
Communication Services	3.4%	6.1%

Return for Risk

BTAL vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTAL

BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 0
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 0

CLSE

CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 95
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTAL vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTAL	CLSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.72	3.84	-5.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.70	5.20	-7.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.72	1.67	-0.95
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	10.55	-11.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.72	39.58	-41.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTAL vs. CLSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTAL Sharpe Ratio is -1.72, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTAL and CLSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTAL	CLSE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.72	3.84	-5.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.24	1.59	-1.83

Drawdowns

BTAL vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTAL drawdown since its inception was -50.28%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTAL and CLSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTAL	CLSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.28%	-16.45%	-33.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.50%	-4.85%	-32.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.16%	-16.45%	-28.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.93%	0.00%	-49.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.95%	-3.59%	-18.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.54%	1.29%	+20.25%

Volatility

BTAL vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) at 4.31%. This indicates that BTAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTAL	CLSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.54%	4.31%	+3.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.38%	10.21%	+5.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.59%	13.32%	+8.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.75%	13.88%	+4.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.23%	13.88%	+3.35%

BTAL vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTAL has a 2.11% expense ratio, which is higher than CLSE's 1.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

BTAL vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than CLSE's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund	3.10%	2.49%	3.49%	6.14%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.88%	0.39%
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	0.76%	0.95%	0.93%	1.21%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BTAL and CLSE in my portfolio?

BTAL and CLSE have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BTAL or CLSE?

BTAL has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to CLSE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTAL dropped -50.28% vs CLSE's -16.45%.

Which ETF is better, BTAL or CLSE?

On 3-year performance, CLSE leads with 32.39% vs -12.64% for BTAL. On fees, CLSE is cheaper at 1.56% per year. On volatility, CLSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BTAL or CLSE?

Over the 3-year period, CLSE has performed better with a 32.39% return vs -12.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BTAL or CLSE?

CLSE is cheaper with a 1.56% expense ratio, compared with 2.11% for BTAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BTAL or CLSE?

BTAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 0.76% for CLSE.

What is the main difference between BTAL and CLSE?

They also come from different issuers: AGF and Convergence Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 2.11% for BTAL and 1.56% for CLSE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs -1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.