BTAL vs. CCOR
BTAL (AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BTAL is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by AGF, while CCOR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Core Alternative Capital. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BTAL returned -5.99%/yr vs -2.18%/yr for CCOR. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BTAL charges 1.40%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.
Performance
BTAL vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BTAL achieves a -24.11% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's -4.04% return.
BTAL
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -10.49%
- YTD
- -24.11%
- 6M
- -22.69%
- 1Y
- -38.86%
- 3Y*
- -13.90%
- 5Y*
- -5.99%
- 10Y*
- -5.79%
CCOR
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -4.04%
- 6M
- -4.17%
- 1Y
- -5.15%
- 3Y*
- -2.14%
- 5Y*
- -2.18%
- 10Y*
- —
BTAL vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | -24.11% | -20.17% | 12.83% | -15.11% | 20.48% | -6.81% | -13.86% | 1.07% | 15.13% | -4.74% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -4.04% | 3.52% | -5.70% | -11.92% | 2.51% | 9.90% | 4.07% | 6.03% | 4.64% | 3.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTAL and CCOR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.00 |
Over the past year, BTAL and CCOR have become more correlated (0.23) than their long-term average of 0.00, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BTAL vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank
BTAL
CCOR
BTAL vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BTAL | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 0.89 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -0.59 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.84 | -1.27 | -0.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BTAL vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTAL drawdown since its inception was -52.70%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTAL and CCOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTAL | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.70% | -22.99% | -29.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.86% | -8.79% | -30.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.83% | -12.31% | -35.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.83% | -22.99% | -24.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.70% | -20.30% | -32.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.05% | -7.34% | -14.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.09% | 4.07% | +17.02% |
Volatility
BTAL vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison
AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 3.21%. This indicates that BTAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BTAL | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.55% | 3.21% | +5.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.47% | 5.51% | +10.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.63% | 7.44% | +15.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 11.14% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 10.76% | +6.62% |
BTAL vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTAL has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BTAL vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison
BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than CCOR's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | 3.28% | 2.49% | 3.49% | 6.14% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.04% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BTAL and CCOR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTAL has higher volatility (8.55%) compared to CCOR (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BTAL dropped -52.70% vs CCOR's -22.99%.
On 5-year performance, CCOR leads with -2.18% vs -5.99% for BTAL. On fees, CCOR is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CCOR has performed better with a -2.18% return vs -5.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CCOR is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.40% for BTAL.
BTAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 1.04% for CCOR.
BTAL is categorized as Equity Market Neutral, while CCOR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: AGF and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 1.40% for BTAL and 1.09% for CCOR.
CCOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BTAL and CCOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer