BTAL vs. CCOR
Compare and contrast key facts about AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR).
BTAL and CCOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BTAL is a passively managed fund by AGF that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Thematic Market Neutral Anti-Beta Total Return Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2011. CCOR is an actively managed fund by Core Alternative Capital. It was launched on May 24, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BTAL or CCOR.
Key characteristics
BTAL | CCOR | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 14.81% | -3.23% |
1Y Return | -1.28% | -4.98% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 8.79% | -2.96% |
5Y Return (Ann) | -1.63% | 0.42% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.02 | -0.57 |
Sortino Ratio | 0.09 | -0.81 |
Omega Ratio | 1.01 | 0.91 |
Calmar Ratio | -0.01 | -0.23 |
Martin Ratio | -0.05 | -1.01 |
Ulcer Index | 6.44% | 5.13% |
Daily Std Dev | 16.69% | 9.14% |
Max Drawdown | -38.36% | -22.99% |
Current Drawdown | -20.55% | -17.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between BTAL and CCOR is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
BTAL vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BTAL achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -3.23% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BTAL vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTAL has a 2.11% expense ratio, which is higher than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BTAL vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BTAL vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison
BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than CCOR's 1.16% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | 5.35% | 6.14% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
Core Alternative ETF | 1.16% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
BTAL vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTAL drawdown since its inception was -38.36%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTAL and CCOR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BTAL vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.42%. This indicates that BTAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.