PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSVO vs. XSVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSVO vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSVO achieves a 20.22% return, which is significantly higher than XSVM's 18.52% return.


BSVO

1D
1.80%
1M
0.51%
YTD
20.22%
6M
19.77%
1Y
45.25%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
10Y*

XSVM

1D
1.41%
1M
1.89%
YTD
18.52%
6M
18.72%
1Y
37.81%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
12.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSVO vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSVO
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
20.22%9.21%4.68%22.38%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
18.52%7.47%2.30%22.88%

Correlation

The correlation between BSVO and XSVM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023

0.95

The correlation between BSVO and XSVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSVO vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSVO
XSVM

Financial Services

32.3%
38.8%

Energy

15.8%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

14.3%
17.0%

Industrials

13.8%
6.7%

Basic Materials

6.0%
1.9%

Technology

4.9%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
7.3%

Communication Services

3.9%
2.9%

Healthcare

3.6%
1.4%

Real Estate

0.6%
5.0%

Utilities

-

1.3%

Financial Services

BSVO
32.3%
XSVM
38.8%

Energy

BSVO
15.8%
XSVM
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BSVO
14.3%
XSVM
17.0%

Industrials

BSVO
13.8%
XSVM
6.7%

Basic Materials

BSVO
6.0%
XSVM
1.9%

Technology

BSVO
4.9%
XSVM
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

BSVO
4.8%
XSVM
7.3%

Communication Services

BSVO
3.9%
XSVM
2.9%

Healthcare

BSVO
3.6%
XSVM
1.4%

Real Estate

BSVO
0.6%
XSVM
5.0%

Utilities

BSVO

-

XSVM
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSVO vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSVO
BSVO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BSVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSVO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
BSVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSVO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

XSVM
XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSVO vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSVOXSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.36

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.47

3.77

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.58

11.60

+3.98

BSVO vs. XSVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the XSVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSVO and XSVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSVOXSVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.05

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.37

+0.44

Drawdowns

BSVO vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSVO drawdown since its inception was -28.67%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSVO and XSVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSVOXSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.67%

-62.57%

+33.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-10.08%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.67%

-26.21%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.07%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-11.56%

+5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.27%

-0.36%

Volatility

BSVO vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) is 4.83%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that BSVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSVOXSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

5.29%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

12.11%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.88%

18.60%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.73%

22.72%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

25.09%

-3.36%

BSVO vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSVO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSVO vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison

BSVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than XSVM's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSVO
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
1.26%1.52%1.61%1.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.79%2.29%1.69%1.31%1.79%1.23%1.21%1.22%2.54%1.90%2.29%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BSVO and XSVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XSVM has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to BSVO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSVO dropped -28.67% vs XSVM's -62.57%.

On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 19.99% vs 17.43% for XSVM. On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, BSVO has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 19.99% return vs 17.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.

XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.26% for BSVO.

BSVO is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XSVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Bridgeway and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for BSVO and 0.37% for XSVM.

BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSVO and XSVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer