PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSVO vs. XSVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSVO vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BSVO having a 27.67% return and XSVM slightly lower at 27.31%.


BSVO

1D
1.62%
1M
3.17%
6M
16.16%
YTD
27.67%
1Y
49.97%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.53%

XSVM

1D
1.19%
1M
3.59%
6M
17.18%
YTD
27.31%
1Y
43.31%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
10.26%
10Y*
13.04%
ALL TIME*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.29M$4.03M$4.10M
$2.64M$2.37M$2.08M

BSVO vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSVO
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
27.67%9.21%4.68%21.95%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
27.31%7.47%2.30%18.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BSVO and XSVM is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2023

0.95

The correlation between BSVO and XSVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSVO vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSVO
XSVM

Financial Services

34.7%
45.1%

Consumer Cyclical

15.7%
18.1%

Industrials

13.0%
5.3%

Energy

12.5%
5.7%

Technology

6.1%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.1%

Basic Materials

4.8%
3.0%

Communication Services

4.1%
2.6%

Healthcare

3.7%
1.7%

Real Estate

0.7%
9.7%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Financial Services

BSVO
34.7%
XSVM
45.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BSVO
15.7%
XSVM
18.1%

Industrials

BSVO
13.0%
XSVM
5.3%

Energy

BSVO
12.5%
XSVM
5.7%

Technology

BSVO
6.1%
XSVM
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

BSVO
4.9%
XSVM
4.1%

Basic Materials

BSVO
4.8%
XSVM
3.0%

Communication Services

BSVO
4.1%
XSVM
2.6%

Healthcare

BSVO
3.7%
XSVM
1.7%

Real Estate

BSVO
0.7%
XSVM
9.7%

Utilities

BSVO

-

XSVM
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSVO vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSVO
BSVO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BSVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSVO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BSVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSVO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XSVM
XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSVO vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSVOXSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.43

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.04

4.32

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.67

13.79

+4.88

BSVO vs. XSVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the XSVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSVO and XSVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSVO vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSVO drawdown since its inception was -28.67%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSVO and XSVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSVOXSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.67%

-62.57%

+33.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-10.08%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.67%

-26.21%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.28%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-11.48%

+5.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

3.15%

-0.47%

Volatility

BSVO vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) is 3.74%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that BSVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSVOXSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

4.25%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

11.78%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.94%

17.83%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

22.34%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.41%

25.01%

-3.60%

BSVO vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSVO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSVO vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison

BSVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than XSVM's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSVO
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
1.19%1.52%1.61%1.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSVM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.73%2.29%1.69%1.31%1.79%1.23%1.21%1.22%2.54%1.90%2.29%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BSVO and XSVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XSVM has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to BSVO (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSVO dropped -28.67% vs XSVM's -62.57%.

On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 16.92% vs 15.08% for XSVM. On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, BSVO has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 16.92% return vs 15.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.

XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.19% for BSVO.

BSVO is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XSVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Bridgeway and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for BSVO and 0.37% for XSVM.

BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSVO and XSVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer