BSVO vs. USVM
BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) and USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSVO is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bridgeway, while USVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. BSVO is actively managed, while USVM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSVO returned 18.56%/yr vs 19.79%/yr for USVM. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSVO charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USVM.
Performance
BSVO vs. USVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSVO achieves a 18.09% return, which is significantly higher than USVM's 15.26% return.
BSVO
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 18.09%
- 6M
- 17.20%
- 1Y
- 41.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USVM
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- —
BSVO vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 18.09% | 9.21% | 4.68% | 22.38% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 15.26% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 21.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSVO and USVM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between BSVO and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSVO vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSVO
USVM
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Financial Services
BSVO
USVM
Energy
BSVO
USVM
Consumer Cyclical
BSVO
USVM
Industrials
BSVO
USVM
Basic Materials
BSVO
USVM
Technology
BSVO
USVM
Consumer Defensive
BSVO
USVM
Communication Services
BSVO
USVM
Healthcare
BSVO
USVM
Real Estate
BSVO
USVM
Utilities
BSVO
-
USVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSVO vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank
BSVO
USVM
BSVO vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSVO | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.99 | 3.66 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.22 | 13.76 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSVO | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 2.05 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.49 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
BSVO vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSVO drawdown since its inception was -28.67%, smaller than the maximum USVM drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSVO and USVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSVO | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.67% | -42.38% | +13.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -8.36% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.67% | -24.34% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | -0.57% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -7.90% | +2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 2.22% | +0.69% |
Volatility
BSVO vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 4.50%. This indicates that BSVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSVO | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 4.50% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 10.73% | +1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.88% | 14.93% | +3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 19.65% | +2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 22.01% | -0.29% |
BSVO vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSVO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSVO vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison
BSVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than USVM's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.76% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BSVO and USVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BSVO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to USVM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSVO dropped -28.67% vs USVM's -42.38%.
On 3-year performance, USVM leads with 19.79% vs 18.56% for BSVO. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, USVM has performed better with a 19.79% return vs 18.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.29% for BSVO.
BSVO is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Bridgeway and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for BSVO and 0.29% for USVM.
BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSVO and USVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer