PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSV vs. SCHJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSV vs. SCHJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSV achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than SCHJ's 0.85% return.


BSV

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.12%
6M
0.42%
YTD
0.52%
1Y
2.46%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
1.92%
ALL TIME*
2.52%

SCHJ

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.18%
6M
0.56%
YTD
0.85%
1Y
3.10%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$128.14M$170.40M$199.65M
$5.83M$7.78M$6.51M

BSV vs. SCHJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
0.52%6.00%3.78%4.90%-5.49%-1.09%4.70%0.05%
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.85%6.80%4.89%6.36%-5.73%-0.67%5.30%0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BSV and SCHJ is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019

0.86

The correlation between BSV and SCHJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSV vs. SCHJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSV
BSV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHJ
SCHJ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSV vs. SCHJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSVSCHJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.11

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.92

7.94

-2.02

BSV vs. SCHJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSV Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the SCHJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSV and SCHJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSV vs. SCHJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSV drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum SCHJ drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSV and SCHJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSVSCHJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-13.62%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-1.47%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.53%

-1.47%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.39%

-9.35%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.22%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-1.84%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

0.39%

+0.03%

Volatility

BSV vs. SCHJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) is 0.47%, while Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) has a volatility of 0.51%. This indicates that BSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSVSCHJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

0.51%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.41%

1.53%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71%

1.86%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.74%

2.96%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.38%

4.10%

-1.72%

BSV vs. SCHJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSV and SCHJ have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSV vs. SCHJ - Dividend Comparison

BSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than SCHJ's 4.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSV
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares
4.04%3.83%3.38%2.46%1.50%1.45%1.79%2.29%1.99%1.65%1.48%1.40%
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.53%4.42%4.00%2.98%1.64%0.94%2.54%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BSV and SCHJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHJ has higher volatility (0.51%) compared to BSV (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSV dropped -8.54% vs SCHJ's -13.62%.

On 5-year performance, SCHJ leads with 2.32% vs 1.62% for BSV. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHJ has performed better with a 2.32% return vs 1.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSV and SCHJ have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 4.04% for BSV.

BSV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index, while SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab.

SCHJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSV and SCHJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer