BSMR vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSMR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMR is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSMR returned 0.48%/yr vs 16.24%/yr for XLG. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSMR charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

BSMR vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMR achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 7.57% return.

BSMR

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 4.16%
• 3Y*: 3.03%
• 5Y*: 0.48%
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 4.22%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 28.54%
• 3Y*: 24.46%
• 5Y*: 16.24%
• 10Y*: 17.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMR vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF	1.04%	3.10%	1.51%	4.47%	-7.60%	1.09%	4.97%	0.16%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	7.57%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMR and XLG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019	0.11

BSMR vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSMR	XLG
Financial Services	1.9%	9.6%
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	11.3%
Basic Materials	-	0.6%
Communication Services	-	17.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.8%
Energy	-	2.7%
Healthcare	-	7.0%
Industrials	-	1.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	43.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BSMR vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMR

BSMR Risk / Return Rank: 94
BSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
BSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
BSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
BSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 56
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMR vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSMR	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.33	2.15	+1.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.57	2.92	+2.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.38	+0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.37	2.31	+5.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	23.41	8.66	+14.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSMR vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSMR Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is higher than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSMR and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSMR	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.33	2.15	+1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.87	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.62	-0.41

Drawdowns

BSMR vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMR drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMR and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMR	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.49%	-52.39%	+38.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.57%	-12.41%	+11.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.50%	-20.70%	+17.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.02%	-28.02%	+16.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.44%	+1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-7.64%	+4.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.18%	3.30%	-3.12%

Volatility

BSMR vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR) is 0.34%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that BSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSMR	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.34%	3.19%	-2.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.92%	9.80%	-8.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25%	13.33%	-12.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.03%	18.68%	-15.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.72%	18.84%	-13.12%

BSMR vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BSMR vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

BSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF	2.72%	2.77%	2.78%	2.72%	1.40%	1.00%	1.49%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSMR and XLG in my portfolio?

BSMR and XLG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSMR or XLG?

XLG has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to BSMR (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSMR dropped -13.49% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, BSMR or XLG?

On 5-year performance, XLG leads with 16.24% vs 0.48% for BSMR. On fees, BSMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSMR or XLG?

Over the 5-year period, XLG has performed better with a 16.24% return vs 0.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSMR or XLG?

BSMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSMR or XLG?

BSMR has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.

What is the main difference between BSMR and XLG?

BSMR is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while XLG is S&P 500. BSMR tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMR and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.