BSMP vs. AMDL

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BSMP (Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSMP is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2025 Index, while AMDL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (200%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. BSMP charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for AMDL.

Performance

BSMP vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BSMP

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDL

• 1D: -10.82%
• 1M: -7.65%
• 6M: 241.84%
• YTD: 282.51%
• 1Y: 455.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMP vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BSMP Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF	0.00%	2.27%	2.65%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	282.51%	103.00%	-69.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMP and AMDL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024	-0.04

The correlation between BSMP and AMDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BSMP vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 91
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMP vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMP) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSMP	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.34	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.28	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.41	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	8.19	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.79	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMP	AMDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-88.63%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-56.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-28.12%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-46.83%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	29.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSMP	AMDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	43.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	106.86%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	137.54%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	119.34%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	119.34%	—

BSMP vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMP has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSMP vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

BSMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BSMP Invesco BulletShares 2025 Municipal Bond ETF	1.05%	2.35%	2.53%	2.20%	1.23%	0.72%	1.32%	0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSMP and AMDL in my portfolio?

BSMP and AMDL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BSMP or AMDL?

On fees, BSMP is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSMP or AMDL?

BSMP is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AMDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSMP or AMDL?

BSMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

What is the main difference between BSMP and AMDL?

BSMP is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities. BSMP tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2025 Index, while AMDL tracks Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSMP and 1.07% for AMDL.