BSMIX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund (BSMIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
BSMIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 13, 2015. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
BSMIX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSMIX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMIX iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund | -1.37% | 11.92% | 12.04% | 17.15% | -18.39% | 18.00% | 20.28% | 27.62% | -10.22% | 16.75% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -0.70% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSMIX achieves a -1.37% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, BSMIX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 10.11%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.
BSMIX
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -8.33%
- YTD
- -1.37%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 19.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.11%
FASGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSMIX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSMIX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BSMIX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
BSMIX
FASGX
BSMIX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund (BSMIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSMIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.41 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 2.01 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.30 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 2.00 | -0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 8.74 | -3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSMIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.41 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.55 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.71 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.60 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSMIX and FASGX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BSMIX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
BSMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than FASGX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMIX iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund | 2.94% | 2.90% | 2.04% | 1.37% | 4.94% | 4.77% | 4.42% | 2.83% | 4.33% | 2.83% | 1.45% | 0.00% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.39% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
BSMIX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSMIX drawdown since its inception was -41.32%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMIX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSMIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.32% | -47.35% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.24% | -9.07% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.33% | -23.54% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.32% | -27.20% | -14.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.39% | -5.77% | -3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.52% | -6.74% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.07% | +1.22% |
Volatility
BSMIX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Index Fund (BSMIX) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 5.30%. This indicates that BSMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSMIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.35% | 5.30% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.71% | 8.12% | +4.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.93% | 13.00% | +8.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 12.18% | +8.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 12.58% | +9.05% |