BSJU vs. XLG
BSJU (Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJU is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2030 Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSJU returned 8.55%/yr vs 21.61%/yr for XLG. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BSJU charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
BSJU vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJU achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 4.68% return.
BSJU
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 1Y
- 6.17%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.58%
XLG
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- 21.61%
- 5Y*
- 14.02%
- 10Y*
- 16.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.49M | $2.06M | $1.81M | |
| $59.56M | $59.06M | $102.51M |
BSJU vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJU Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.41% | 8.58% | 8.20% | 12.91% | -2.11% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 4.68% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -6.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJU and XLG is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.62 |
The correlation between BSJU and XLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJU vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
BSJU
XLG
BSJU vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSJU | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.22 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 1.44 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.20 | 4.49 | +6.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSJU vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJU drawdown since its inception was -7.51%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJU and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJU | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -52.39% | +44.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.53% | -12.41% | +9.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.09% | -20.70% | +15.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -4.09% | +4.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -7.62% | +6.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 3.98% | -3.43% |
Volatility
BSJU vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) is 0.94%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that BSJU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJU | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 5.30% | -4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.21% | 11.66% | -8.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.97% | 14.73% | -10.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.76% | 18.91% | -11.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.76% | 18.93% | -11.17% |
BSJU vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJU has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJU vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
BSJU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than XLG's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJU Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.67% | 6.52% | 7.08% | 6.74% | 2.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.64% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJU and XLG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLG has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to BSJU (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJU dropped -7.51% vs XLG's -52.39%.
On 3-year performance, XLG leads with 21.61% vs 8.55% for BSJU. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BSJU has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XLG has performed better with a 21.61% return vs 8.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJU.
BSJU has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 0.64% for XLG.
BSJU is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XLG is S&P 500. BSJU tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2030 Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJU and 0.20% for XLG.
BSJU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSJU and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer