PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJU vs. BSJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJU vs. BSJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BSJU

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.27%
6M
1.42%
YTD
2.12%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
8.44%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.52%

BSJP

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.38M$2.03M$1.78M

BSJU vs. BSJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BSJU
Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
2.12%8.58%8.20%12.91%-2.11%
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%4.46%8.07%10.41%0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJU and BSJP is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between BSJU and BSJP has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJU vs. BSJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSJU
BSJU Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BSJU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJU Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJU Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSJU vs. BSJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSJUBSJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

BSJU vs. BSJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSJU vs. BSJP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJUBSJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

Volatility

BSJU vs. BSJP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJUBSJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.76%

BSJU vs. BSJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSJU and BSJP have an expense ratio of 0.42%.


Dividends

BSJU vs. BSJP - Dividend Comparison

BSJU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, more than BSJP's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSJP
Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.52%4.50%6.25%7.07%5.37%4.27%4.96%5.49%5.84%1.32%
BSJU
Invesco Bulletshares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.68%6.52%7.08%6.74%2.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJU and BSJP have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.42% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSJU and BSJP have the same expense ratio: 0.42% per year.

BSJU has the higher dividend yield at 6.68%, compared with 1.52% for BSJP.

BSJU tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2030 Index, while BSJP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJU and BSJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer