BSJT vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BSJT (Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJT is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSJT returned 8.62%/yr vs 24.70%/yr for XLG. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSJT charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

BSJT vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJT achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 8.03% return.

BSJT

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.33%
• 6M: 1.89%
• 1Y: 6.65%
• 3Y*: 8.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 8.03%
• 6M: 7.64%
• 1Y: 28.88%
• 3Y*: 24.70%
• 5Y*: 16.34%
• 10Y*: 17.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJT vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BSJT Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.33%	7.63%	8.01%	13.59%	-14.85%	-0.52%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	8.03%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJT and XLG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021	0.58

The correlation between BSJT and XLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSJT vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSJT	XLG
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	11.3%
Technology	7.2%	43.9%
Energy	6.7%	2.7%
Industrials	6.3%	1.9%
Communication Services	3.3%	17.1%
Real Estate	3.2%	-
Financial Services	2.9%	9.6%
Basic Materials	2.8%	0.6%
Utilities	1.9%	-
Healthcare	1.6%	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	5.8%

Return for Risk

BSJT vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJT

BSJT Risk / Return Rank: 58
BSJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
BSJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BSJT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BSJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BSJT Martin Ratio Rank: 65

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 60
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJT vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSJT	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.18	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.95	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.38	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	2.34	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.54	8.77	+2.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSJT vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJT and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSJT	XLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	2.18	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.63	-0.30

Drawdowns

BSJT vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJT drawdown since its inception was -19.62%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJT and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSJT	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.62%	-52.39%	+32.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.47%	-12.41%	+9.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.59%	-20.70%	+15.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-1.02%	+1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.44%	-7.64%	+2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.58%	3.30%	-2.72%

Volatility

BSJT vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) is 0.96%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that BSJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSJT	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.96%	3.19%	-2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.62%	9.81%	-7.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.68%	13.32%	-9.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.20%	18.68%	-10.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.20%	18.84%	-10.64%

BSJT vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSJT vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

BSJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%, more than XLG's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSJT Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.75%	6.77%	6.65%	6.42%	5.45%	1.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSJT and XLG in my portfolio?

BSJT and XLG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSJT or XLG?

XLG has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to BSJT (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJT dropped -19.62% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, BSJT or XLG?

On 3-year performance, XLG leads with 24.70% vs 8.62% for BSJT. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BSJT has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSJT or XLG?

Over the 3-year period, XLG has performed better with a 24.70% return vs 8.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSJT or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSJT or XLG?

BSJT has the higher dividend yield at 6.75%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.

What is the main difference between BSJT and XLG?

BSJT is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XLG is S&P 500. BSJT tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJT and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.