BSJT vs. IHY
BSJT (Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and IHY (VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - BSJT tracks the Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index while IHY tracks the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Ex-‐US Issuers High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSJT returned 8.51%/yr vs 9.24%/yr for IHY. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSJT charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IHY.
Performance
BSJT vs. IHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJT achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than IHY's 1.45% return.
BSJT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 7.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IHY
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- 6.76%
- 3Y*
- 9.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.85%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
BSJT vs. IHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJT Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.36% | 7.63% | 8.01% | 13.59% | -14.85% | -0.52% |
IHY VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF | 1.45% | 13.39% | 3.55% | 12.11% | -14.34% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJT and IHY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021 | 0.63 |
The correlation between BSJT and IHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
BSJT vs. IHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSJT
IHY
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
BSJT
IHY
-
Technology
BSJT
IHY
-
Energy
BSJT
IHY
-
Industrials
BSJT
IHY
-
Communication Services
BSJT
IHY
-
Real Estate
BSJT
IHY
-
Financial Services
BSJT
IHY
Basic Materials
BSJT
IHY
-
Utilities
BSJT
IHY
-
Healthcare
BSJT
IHY
-
Consumer Defensive
BSJT
IHY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJT vs. IHY — Risk / Return Rank
BSJT
IHY
BSJT vs. IHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSJT | IHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.92 | 1.26 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.04 | 1.92 | +1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.23 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 1.53 | +1.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 5.52 | +6.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSJT | IHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.26 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.55 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
BSJT vs. IHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJT drawdown since its inception was -19.62%, smaller than the maximum IHY drawdown of -27.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJT and IHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJT | IHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.62% | -27.63% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.47% | -4.75% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.59% | -4.75% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.63% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.45% | -5.28% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 1.32% | -0.74% |
Volatility
BSJT vs. IHY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) is 0.99%, while VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) has a volatility of 1.34%. This indicates that BSJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJT | IHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 1.34% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 3.91% | -1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.69% | 5.40% | -1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 7.74% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 7.72% | +0.49% |
BSJT vs. IHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IHY's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJT vs. IHY - Dividend Comparison
BSJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%, more than IHY's 5.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJT Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.75% | 6.77% | 6.65% | 6.42% | 5.45% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IHY VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF | 5.66% | 5.31% | 5.60% | 5.26% | 4.97% | 4.55% | 4.65% | 4.86% | 4.70% | 4.36% | 5.11% | 5.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJT and IHY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHY has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to BSJT (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJT dropped -19.62% vs IHY's -27.63%.
On 3-year performance, IHY leads with 9.24% vs 8.51% for BSJT. On fees, IHY is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BSJT has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IHY has performed better with a 9.24% return vs 8.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHY is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJT.
BSJT has the higher dividend yield at 6.75%, compared with 5.66% for IHY.
BSJT tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while IHY tracks Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Ex-‐US Issuers High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJT and 0.40% for IHY.
BSJT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSJT and IHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer