PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJT vs. IHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJT vs. IHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJT achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than IHY's 1.45% return.


BSJT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.36%
6M
2.14%
1Y
7.07%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
10Y*

IHY

1D
0.05%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.45%
6M
2.69%
1Y
6.76%
3Y*
9.24%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*
4.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJT vs. IHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BSJT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.36%7.63%8.01%13.59%-14.85%-0.52%
IHY
VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF
1.45%13.39%3.55%12.11%-14.34%-3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJT and IHY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021

0.63

The correlation between BSJT and IHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSJT vs. IHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJT
IHY

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%

-

Technology

7.2%

-

Energy

6.7%

-

Industrials

6.3%

-

Communication Services

3.3%

-

Real Estate

3.2%

-

Financial Services

2.9%
100.0%

Basic Materials

2.8%

-

Utilities

1.9%

-

Healthcare

1.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

BSJT
9.0%
IHY

-

Technology

BSJT
7.2%
IHY

-

Energy

BSJT
6.7%
IHY

-

Industrials

BSJT
6.3%
IHY

-

Communication Services

BSJT
3.3%
IHY

-

Real Estate

BSJT
3.2%
IHY

-

Financial Services

BSJT
2.9%
IHY
100.0%

Basic Materials

BSJT
2.8%
IHY

-

Utilities

BSJT
1.9%
IHY

-

Healthcare

BSJT
1.6%
IHY

-

Consumer Defensive

BSJT
1.2%
IHY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJT vs. IHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJT
BSJT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BSJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IHY
IHY Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHY Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHY Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJT vs. IHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSJTIHYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.92

1.26

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.04

1.92

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.23

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

1.53

+1.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.25

5.52

+6.73

BSJT vs. IHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the IHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJT and IHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJTIHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.26

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.55

-0.21

Drawdowns

BSJT vs. IHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJT drawdown since its inception was -19.62%, smaller than the maximum IHY drawdown of -27.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJT and IHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJTIHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.62%

-27.63%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-4.75%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.59%

-4.75%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.63%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-5.28%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

1.32%

-0.74%

Volatility

BSJT vs. IHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) is 0.99%, while VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY) has a volatility of 1.34%. This indicates that BSJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJTIHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

1.34%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

3.91%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

5.40%

-1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.21%

7.74%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.21%

7.72%

+0.49%

BSJT vs. IHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IHY's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJT vs. IHY - Dividend Comparison

BSJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%, more than IHY's 5.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.75%6.77%6.65%6.42%5.45%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IHY
VanEck Vectors International High Yield Bond ETF
5.66%5.31%5.60%5.26%4.97%4.55%4.65%4.86%4.70%4.36%5.11%5.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJT and IHY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHY has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to BSJT (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJT dropped -19.62% vs IHY's -27.63%.

On 3-year performance, IHY leads with 9.24% vs 8.51% for BSJT. On fees, IHY is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BSJT has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IHY has performed better with a 9.24% return vs 8.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IHY is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJT.

BSJT has the higher dividend yield at 6.75%, compared with 5.66% for IHY.

BSJT tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while IHY tracks Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Ex-­‐US Issuers High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJT and 0.40% for IHY.

BSJT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJT and IHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer