PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJT vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJT vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJT achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 10.72% return.


BSJT

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.36%
6M
1.17%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
10Y*

RSP

1D
0.71%
1M
2.23%
YTD
10.72%
6M
9.45%
1Y
18.70%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJT vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BSJT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.36%7.63%8.01%13.59%-14.85%-0.44%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
10.72%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%6.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJT and RSP is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021

0.62

The correlation between BSJT and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJT vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJT
BSJT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BSJT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJT Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJT vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSJTRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.39

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.37

9.03

+0.34

BSJT vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJT Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJT and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSJT vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJT drawdown since its inception was -19.62%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJT and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJTRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.62%

-59.92%

+40.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-7.85%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.59%

-17.81%

+12.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.79%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-6.64%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

2.08%

-1.50%

Volatility

BSJT vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) is 0.87%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that BSJT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJTRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

3.59%

-2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

8.69%

-6.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68%

11.81%

-8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.16%

16.20%

-8.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.16%

18.33%

-10.17%

BSJT vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJT vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

BSJT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than RSP's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.69%6.77%6.65%6.42%5.45%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.52%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJT and RSP have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSP has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to BSJT (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJT dropped -19.62% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 3-year performance, RSP leads with 15.14% vs 8.85% for BSJT. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BSJT has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RSP has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJT.

BSJT has the higher dividend yield at 6.69%, compared with 1.52% for RSP.

BSJT is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while RSP is S&P 500. BSJT tracks Invesco BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJT and 0.20% for RSP.

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJT and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer