BSJS vs. PULS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BSJS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSJS is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index, while PULS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM. BSJS is passively managed, while PULS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BSJS returned 3.29%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for PULS. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSJS charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PULS.

Performance

BSJS vs. PULS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BSJS having a 1.67% return and PULS slightly higher at 1.73%.

BSJS

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 1.67%
• 6M: 2.13%
• 1Y: 6.48%
• 3Y*: 8.32%
• 5Y*: 3.29%
• 10Y*: —

PULS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 2.09%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 5.61%
• 5Y*: 4.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJS vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.67%	8.31%	7.38%	12.28%	-13.69%	3.40%	4.05%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.73%	4.97%	6.12%	6.26%	1.52%	0.48%	0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJS and PULS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020	0.20

The correlation between BSJS and PULS shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSJS vs. PULS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BSJS	PULS
Healthcare	10.5%	-
Industrials	9.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	-
Communication Services	5.5%	-
Energy	5.4%	-
Financial Services	4.6%	1.5%
Technology	4.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	-
Real Estate	2.9%	-
Basic Materials	2.6%	-
Utilities	1.2%	-

Return for Risk

BSJS vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJS

BSJS Risk / Return Rank: 78
BSJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BSJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BSJS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
BSJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
BSJS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

PULS

PULS Risk / Return Rank: 100
PULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Omega Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJS vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BSJS	PULS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	11.41	-9.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.56	32.91	-29.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	7.59	-6.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.97	52.47	-48.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.33	318.56	-299.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BSJS vs. PULS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is lower than the PULS Sharpe Ratio of 11.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJS and PULS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BSJS	PULS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	11.41	-9.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	5.92	-5.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	2.51	-1.98

Drawdowns

BSJS vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJS drawdown since its inception was -17.73%, which is greater than PULS's maximum drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJS and PULS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSJS	PULS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.73%	-5.85%	-11.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.64%	-0.09%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.44%	-0.34%	-4.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.73%	-0.79%	-16.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.05%	0.00%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-0.09%	-3.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	0.01%	+0.33%

Volatility

BSJS vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) has a higher volatility of 0.72% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.11%. This indicates that BSJS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSJS	PULS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.72%	0.11%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.03%	0.30%	+1.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84%	0.41%	+2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.39%	0.70%	+6.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.14%	1.33%	+5.81%

BSJS vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJS has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSJS vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison

BSJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than PULS's 4.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.27%	6.49%	7.04%	6.75%	5.82%	4.86%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.58%	4.78%	5.62%	5.48%	2.30%	1.19%	1.85%	2.69%	1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSJS and PULS in my portfolio?

BSJS and PULS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSJS or PULS?

BSJS has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to PULS (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJS dropped -17.73% vs PULS's -5.85%.

Which ETF is better, BSJS or PULS?

On 5-year performance, PULS leads with 4.12% vs 3.29% for BSJS. On fees, PULS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PULS has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSJS or PULS?

Over the 5-year period, PULS has performed better with a 4.12% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSJS or PULS?

PULS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSJS or PULS?

BSJS has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 4.58% for PULS.

What is the main difference between BSJS and PULS?

BSJS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while PULS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJS and 0.15% for PULS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.41 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.