PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSJR vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSJR vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJR achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 10.53% return.


BSJR

1D
0.15%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.81%
1Y
4.78%
3Y*
7.93%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*

RSP

1D
0.76%
1M
3.73%
YTD
10.53%
6M
10.98%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJR vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BSJR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.27%7.41%7.15%11.91%-11.35%3.60%5.69%3.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
10.53%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJR and RSP is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

0.67

The correlation between BSJR and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSJR vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSJR
RSP

Financial Services

13.8%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
9.9%

Industrials

10.3%
14.1%

Communication Services

6.0%
3.7%

Energy

4.3%
4.5%

Real Estate

4.2%
6.0%

Healthcare

2.7%
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
6.5%

Basic Materials

1.6%
4.1%

Technology

1.6%
19.6%

Utilities

0.8%
6.1%

Financial Services

BSJR
13.8%
RSP
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BSJR
11.2%
RSP
9.9%

Industrials

BSJR
10.3%
RSP
14.1%

Communication Services

BSJR
6.0%
RSP
3.7%

Energy

BSJR
4.3%
RSP
4.5%

Real Estate

BSJR
4.2%
RSP
6.0%

Healthcare

BSJR
2.7%
RSP
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

BSJR
1.8%
RSP
6.5%

Basic Materials

BSJR
1.6%
RSP
4.1%

Technology

BSJR
1.6%
RSP
19.6%

Utilities

BSJR
0.8%
RSP
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSJR vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJR
BSJR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BSJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJR vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSJRRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.32

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

2.64

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.06

10.05

+9.02

BSJR vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJR Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJR and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSJRRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.80

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.53

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.57

-0.14

Drawdowns

BSJR vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJR drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJR and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSJRRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.58%

-59.92%

+37.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.16%

-7.85%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.15%

-17.81%

+14.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.37%

-21.38%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-6.65%

+3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

2.06%

-1.81%

Volatility

BSJR vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) is 0.59%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that BSJR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSJRRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

2.55%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.45%

8.31%

-6.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12%

11.56%

-9.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.73%

16.18%

-9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.36%

18.35%

-8.99%

BSJR vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJR has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSJR vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

BSJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than RSP's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.74%6.19%6.75%6.48%5.37%4.49%4.53%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.48%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSJR and RSP have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSP has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to BSJR (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJR dropped -22.58% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 5-year performance, RSP leads with 8.50% vs 3.40% for BSJR. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BSJR has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RSP has performed better with a 8.50% return vs 3.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJR.

BSJR has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 1.48% for RSP.

BSJR is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while RSP is S&P 500. BSJR tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJR and 0.20% for RSP.

BSJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSJR and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer