BSJR vs. EIFAX
BSJR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and EIFAX (Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund) are both funds - BSJR is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index, while EIFAX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 5 years, BSJR returned 3.30%/yr vs 4.87%/yr for EIFAX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSJR charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for EIFAX.
Performance
BSJR vs. EIFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSJR achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than EIFAX's 0.37% return.
BSJR
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- —
EIFAX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 3.49%
- 3Y*
- 6.86%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 5.09%
BSJR vs. EIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.49% | 7.41% | 7.15% | 11.91% | -11.35% | 3.60% | 5.69% | 3.00% |
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund | 0.37% | 4.54% | 8.91% | 11.86% | -2.98% | 5.41% | 1.90% | 2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSJR and EIFAX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2019 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSJR vs. EIFAX — Risk / Return Rank
BSJR
EIFAX
BSJR vs. EIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSJR | EIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.40 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 1.53 | +2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.76 | 4.61 | +13.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSJR vs. EIFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSJR drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, smaller than the maximum EIFAX drawdown of -40.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJR and EIFAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSJR | EIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.58% | -40.28% | +17.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.16% | -2.29% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.15% | -3.43% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.37% | -7.63% | -8.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.32% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -2.26% | -0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 0.76% | -0.51% |
Volatility
BSJR vs. EIFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) is 0.61%, while Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) has a volatility of 0.70%. This indicates that BSJR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSJR | EIFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 0.70% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.51% | 1.98% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08% | 2.59% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.74% | 3.15% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.33% | 4.46% | +4.87% |
BSJR vs. EIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSJR has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than EIFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSJR vs. EIFAX - Dividend Comparison
BSJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, less than EIFAX's 7.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.66% | 6.19% | 6.75% | 6.48% | 5.37% | 4.49% | 4.53% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund | 7.64% | 8.09% | 8.91% | 7.02% | 5.92% | 4.03% | 4.51% | 5.58% | 5.10% | 4.46% | 5.02% | 5.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSJR and EIFAX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EIFAX has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to BSJR (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJR dropped -22.58% vs EIFAX's -40.28%.
BSJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSJR and EIFAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer