BSJQ vs. PHYD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BSJQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF) and PHYD (Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -) are both High Yield Bonds funds. BSJQ is passively managed, while PHYD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BSJQ returned 7.01%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for PHYD. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BSJQ charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PHYD.

Performance

BSJQ vs. PHYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) and Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSJQ achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than PHYD's 2.32% return.

BSJQ

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 1.02%
• 6M: 1.08%
• 1Y: 4.03%
• 3Y*: 7.01%
• 5Y*: 3.65%
• 10Y*: —

PHYD

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.52%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.40%
• 1Y: 6.95%
• 3Y*: 8.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSJQ vs. PHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BSJQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF	1.02%	6.59%	7.49%	7.22%
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -	2.32%	8.84%	7.35%	8.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BSJQ and PHYD is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2023	0.72

The correlation between BSJQ and PHYD shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BSJQ vs. PHYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSJQ

BSJQ Risk / Return Rank: 95
BSJQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
BSJQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
BSJQ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
BSJQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BSJQ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

PHYD

PHYD Risk / Return Rank: 84
PHYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
PHYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PHYD Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PHYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PHYD Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSJQ vs. PHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) and Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSJQ	PHYD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.00	2.28	+0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.60	3.62	+0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.46	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.48	3.66	+3.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.02	14.79	+15.23

BSJQ vs. PHYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSJQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the PHYD Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSJQ and PHYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BSJQ vs. PHYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSJQ drawdown since its inception was -24.13%, which is greater than PHYD's maximum drawdown of -4.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSJQ and PHYD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSJQ	PHYD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.13%	-4.33%	-19.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.54%	-2.10%	+1.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.66%	-4.14%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.79%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.15%	-0.62%	-1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.13%	0.52%	-0.39%

Volatility

BSJQ vs. PHYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) is 0.61%, while Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) has a volatility of 1.07%. This indicates that BSJQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BSJQ	PHYD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	1.07%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.01%	2.57%	-1.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35%	3.36%	-2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.73%	4.58%	+1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.41%	4.58%	+3.83%

BSJQ vs. PHYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSJQ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than PHYD's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSJQ vs. PHYD - Dividend Comparison

BSJQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, less than PHYD's 8.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BSJQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF	5.79%	6.10%	6.58%	6.58%	5.58%	4.27%	4.64%	4.59%	2.39%
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -	8.52%	6.63%	6.80%	6.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSJQ and PHYD in my portfolio?

BSJQ and PHYD have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BSJQ or PHYD?

PHYD has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to BSJQ (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSJQ dropped -24.13% vs PHYD's -4.33%.

Which ETF is better, BSJQ or PHYD?

On 3-year performance, PHYD leads with 8.72% vs 7.01% for BSJQ. On fees, BSJQ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BSJQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BSJQ or PHYD?

Over the 3-year period, PHYD has performed better with a 8.72% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSJQ or PHYD?

BSJQ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PHYD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSJQ or PHYD?

PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 8.52%, compared with 5.79% for BSJQ.

What is the main difference between BSJQ and PHYD?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BSJQ and 0.55% for PHYD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSJQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.