BSCZ vs. XMMO
BSCZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSCZ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BSCZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
BSCZ vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.
BSCZ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 23.73%
- 6M
- 25.73%
- 1Y
- 36.97%
- 3Y*
- 32.10%
- 5Y*
- 16.69%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
BSCZ vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 5.67% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 23.73% | 11.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCZ and XMMO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.38 |
BSCZ vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BSCZ
XMMO
Healthcare
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Healthcare
BSCZ
XMMO
Communication Services
BSCZ
XMMO
Technology
BSCZ
XMMO
Financial Services
BSCZ
XMMO
Energy
BSCZ
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
BSCZ
XMMO
Industrials
BSCZ
XMMO
Utilities
BSCZ
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
BSCZ
XMMO
Real Estate
BSCZ
XMMO
Basic Materials
BSCZ
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCZ vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
BSCZ
XMMO
BSCZ vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCZ | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.58 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
BSCZ vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCZ | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -55.37% | +52.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | 0.00% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -9.45% | +8.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.04% | — |
Volatility
BSCZ vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCZ | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 18.71% | -13.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 21.45% | -16.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 22.27% | -17.29% |
BSCZ vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BSCZ vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.09% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSCZ and XMMO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
BSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.
BSCZ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XMMO is Momentum. BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.35% for XMMO.
Find the right allocation for BSCZ and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer