PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCZ vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCZ vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.


BSCZ

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.18%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCZ vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BSCZ and XMMO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.38

BSCZ vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSCZ
XMMO

Healthcare

12.1%
6.3%

Communication Services

10.8%
1.6%

Technology

10.5%
16.7%

Financial Services

9.8%
2.4%

Energy

8.9%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
4.6%

Industrials

7.3%
41.1%

Utilities

5.0%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
0.5%

Real Estate

3.5%
6.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
7.2%

Healthcare

BSCZ
12.1%
XMMO
6.3%

Communication Services

BSCZ
10.8%
XMMO
1.6%

Technology

BSCZ
10.5%
XMMO
16.7%

Financial Services

BSCZ
9.8%
XMMO
2.4%

Energy

BSCZ
8.9%
XMMO
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BSCZ
7.4%
XMMO
4.6%

Industrials

BSCZ
7.3%
XMMO
41.1%

Utilities

BSCZ
5.0%
XMMO
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

BSCZ
4.6%
XMMO
0.5%

Real Estate

BSCZ
3.5%
XMMO
6.1%

Basic Materials

BSCZ
1.7%
XMMO
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCZ vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCZ

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCZ vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSCZ vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCZXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.58

+0.64

Drawdowns

BSCZ vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCZXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-55.37%

+52.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

0.00%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-9.45%

+8.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

Volatility

BSCZ vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCZXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98%

18.71%

-13.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

21.45%

-16.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

22.27%

-17.29%

BSCZ vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSCZ vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCZ
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF
4.09%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCZ and XMMO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSCZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSCZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

BSCZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

BSCZ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XMMO is Momentum. BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.35% for XMMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCZ and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer