BSCZ vs. VCIT
BSCZ (Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF) and VCIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - BSCZ tracks the BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index while VCIT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BSCZ returned 5.27% vs 5.17% for VCIT. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BSCZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VCIT.
Performance
BSCZ vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than VCIT's 0.31% return.
BSCZ
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 5.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCIT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 2.87%
BSCZ vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.26% | 5.67% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.31% | 5.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCZ and VCIT is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | 0.97 |
The correlation between BSCZ and VCIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSCZ vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank
BSCZ
VCIT
BSCZ vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BSCZ | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.76 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 5.56 | -0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BSCZ vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and VCIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCZ | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -20.56% | +17.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.28% | -2.96% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -1.22% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -3.15% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 0.93% | +0.15% |
Volatility
BSCZ vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) at 1.24%. This indicates that BSCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSCZ | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 1.24% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.82% | 3.17% | +0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.02% | 4.10% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 6.62% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 6.29% | -1.29% |
BSCZ vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSCZ vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison
BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than VCIT's 4.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCZ Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.52% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.80% | 4.62% | 4.43% | 3.72% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 2.78% | 3.37% | 3.61% | 3.21% | 3.29% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, BSCZ and VCIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BSCZ has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to VCIT (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCZ dropped -3.28% vs VCIT's -20.56%.
On 1-year performance, BSCZ leads with 5.27% vs 5.17% for VCIT. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VCIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BSCZ has performed better with a 5.27% return vs 5.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCZ.
VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 4.52% for BSCZ.
BSCZ tracks BulletShares® USD Corporate Bond 2035 Index, while VCIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCZ and 0.03% for VCIT.
VCIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSCZ and VCIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer