PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCZ vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BSCZ vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BSCZ vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCZ achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 0.57% return.


BSCZ

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
0.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPHQ

1D
2.36%
1M
-6.75%
YTD
0.57%
6M
3.29%
1Y
14.73%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
13.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BSCZ vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BSCZ vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCZ

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCZ vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSCZ vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCZSPHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

0.50

+0.85

Correlation

The correlation between BSCZ and SPHQ is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BSCZ vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

BSCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than SPHQ's 1.19% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCZ
Invesco BulletShares 2035 Corporate Bond ETF
3.25%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.19%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Drawdowns

BSCZ vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCZ drawdown since its inception was -3.28%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCZ and SPHQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCZSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-57.83%

+54.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-6.75%

+4.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.58%

-10.78%

+10.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

Volatility

BSCZ vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BSCZSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98%

17.13%

-12.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

16.40%

-11.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

17.81%

-12.83%