PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCX vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCX vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.54% return.


BSCX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.42%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.43%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPHQ

1D
-2.93%
1M
2.94%
YTD
16.54%
6M
15.11%
1Y
25.84%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
14.14%
10Y*
15.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCX vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSCX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF
0.19%9.31%1.73%7.88%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
16.54%13.25%25.44%5.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCX and SPHQ is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

0.29

The correlation between BSCX and SPHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCX vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCX
BSCX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCX vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSCXSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

2.92

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.19

12.48

-7.30

BSCX vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCX and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSCX vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCX drawdown since its inception was -5.13%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCX and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCXSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.13%

-57.83%

+52.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.90%

-8.90%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-2.93%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-10.68%

+9.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

2.07%

-1.12%

Volatility

BSCX vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCX) is 1.14%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that BSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCXSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

5.88%

-4.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

11.30%

-8.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

13.46%

-9.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.05%

16.59%

-10.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.05%

17.91%

-11.86%

BSCX vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSCX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCX vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

BSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than SPHQ's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSCX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corporate Bond ETF
4.89%4.82%5.00%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.07%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCX and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHQ has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to BSCX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCX dropped -5.13% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 1-year performance, SPHQ leads with 25.84% vs 4.91% for BSCX. On fees, BSCX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCX has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 25.84% return vs 4.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.

BSCX has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 1.07% for SPHQ.

BSCX is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SPHQ is S&P 500. BSCX tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2033 Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for BSCX and 0.15% for SPHQ.

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCX and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer