PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSCW vs. BSCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSCW vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSCW achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than BSCR's 1.27% return.


BSCW

1D
0.12%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.52%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
5.69%
5Y*
10Y*

BSCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.66%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
1.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSCW vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BSCW
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF
0.29%9.00%2.20%9.31%0.31%
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.27%5.77%4.52%6.41%-0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BSCW and BSCR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022

0.83

The correlation between BSCW and BSCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BSCW vs. BSCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSCW
BSCR

Technology

12.4%
10.1%

Financial Services

10.6%
20.9%

Healthcare

10.4%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
12.1%

Communication Services

8.8%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
5.1%

Industrials

5.9%
6.6%

Real Estate

4.8%
3.0%

Energy

4.6%
3.9%

Utilities

3.7%
3.3%

Basic Materials

2.3%
0.9%

Technology

BSCW
12.4%
BSCR
10.1%

Financial Services

BSCW
10.6%
BSCR
20.9%

Healthcare

BSCW
10.4%
BSCR
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BSCW
9.5%
BSCR
12.1%

Communication Services

BSCW
8.8%
BSCR
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

BSCW
6.3%
BSCR
5.1%

Industrials

BSCW
5.9%
BSCR
6.6%

Real Estate

BSCW
4.8%
BSCR
3.0%

Energy

BSCW
4.6%
BSCR
3.9%

Utilities

BSCW
3.7%
BSCR
3.3%

Basic Materials

BSCW
2.3%
BSCR
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSCW vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCW
BSCW Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BSCW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCW Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCW Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSCW vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BSCWBSCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

2.10

-0.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

10.69

-8.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.30

46.31

-40.01

BSCW vs. BSCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSCW Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the BSCR Sharpe Ratio of 4.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSCW and BSCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BSCWBSCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

4.20

-2.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.59

+0.18

Drawdowns

BSCW vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSCW drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, smaller than the maximum BSCR drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCW and BSCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSCWBSCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-17.26%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-0.42%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.24%

-2.41%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

0.00%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-3.34%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.10%

+0.76%

Volatility

BSCW vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCW) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) at 0.19%. This indicates that BSCW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSCWBSCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

0.19%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

0.59%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

1.07%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.23%

4.09%

+3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.23%

5.35%

+1.88%

BSCW vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BSCW and BSCR have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BSCW vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison

BSCW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, more than BSCR's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.29%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%
BSCW
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Corporate Bond ETF
4.82%4.81%5.06%4.80%1.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSCW and BSCR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSCW has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to BSCR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSCW dropped -8.32% vs BSCR's -17.26%.

On 3-year performance, BSCW leads with 5.69% vs 5.23% for BSCR. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BSCW has performed better with a 5.69% return vs 5.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCW and BSCR have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

BSCW has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 4.29% for BSCR.

BSCW tracks Invesco BulletShares Corporate Bond 2032 Index, while BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index.

BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSCW and BSCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer